error [Non-Adelphia-C5843392S]

2004-04-20 Thread abuse
= THIS IS AN AUTORESPONSE ONLY - DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS MESSAGE. ** This may be the only response we send you. ** = ** IMPORTANT: We DO NOT

Bug#244894: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken

2004-04-20 Thread martin f krafft
Package: libstdc++5-3.3-dev Version: 1:3.3.3-6 Severity: normal please inspect the following code: BEGIN ri.cpp #include list int main() { std::listint l; std::listint::iterator i = l.begin(); std::listint::const_iterator ci = l.begin(); std::listint::reverse_iterator ri =

Bug#244894: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken

2004-04-20 Thread Philip Martin
This is currently an open issue with the C++ standard library, see http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#280 -- Philip Martin

cathy

2004-04-20 Thread Ana Shannon
Hollis, Govenment don't want me to sell UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY hacking someone PC! Disappear in your city bannedcd2004 http://www.aol43566.com/cd/ alice,fragment of mirror.

Bug#244894: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken

2004-04-20 Thread martin f krafft
tags 244894 + upstream severity 244894 minor thanks also sprach Philip Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.04.20.2254 +0200]: This is currently an open issue with the C++ standard library, see http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#280 I thought so. Thanks. I hope you don't mind

Processed: Re: Bug#244894: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken

2004-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 244894 + upstream Bug#244894: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream severity 244894 minor Bug#244894: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken Severity set

[Bug c++/11444] [3.3/3.4 regression] function fails to propagate up class tree (template-related)

2004-04-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Summary|[3.3 regression] function |[3.3/3.4 regression] |fails to propagate up class |function fails to propagate

Bug#173513: [Bug optimization/9079] [tree-ssa] Inline constant function pointers

2004-04-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-21 02:23 --- And I have a patch which is for tree-ssa. -- What|Removed |Added

Bug#173513: [Bug optimization/9079] Inline constant function pointers

2004-04-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-21 02:22 --- Actually this is different than PR 3713. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

Bug#173513: [Bug optimization/9079] [tree-ssa] Inline constant function pointers

2004-04-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-21 02:25 --- I should say that I have a partial fix for the tree-ssa, what needs to be done is inlining again. -- What|Removed |Added