Re: augmentation

2004-04-27 Thread Ray Dean
Hi again. I sent you an email 2 days ago and I want to confirm everything now. Please read info below and let me know if you have any questions. We are accepting your mo rtgage application. If you have bad cr.edit, it is ok. You can get $200,000 loa n for $350/month payment. Appr oval

[Bug c/6614] [-Wconversion] incorrect conversion warning for function taking a short

2004-04-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-27 02:46 --- The problem I see here is that the error is just written wrong. I think it should say something like: warning: passing arg 1 of `func' is not converted due to a prototype. -- What|Removed

Debian, best meds

2004-04-27 Thread Illustration V. Mistake
Well well well!You have the power to think what you want. No matter what the circumstance.Confess you were wrong yesterday it will show you are wise today. Debian, interested in saving up to 70% on medications? http://sautoire.gfd-online.com/cia/?dcent cyanobenzene There is no living with thee,

[Bug c/6614] [-Wconversion] incorrect conversion warning for function taking a short

2004-04-27 Thread falk at debian dot org
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2004-04-27 12:46 --- No, the message really means what it says. This warning was designed for people who also use compilers which do not support prototypes. Nowadays, it is very unlikely to be useful for anybody; IMHO we might as well

[Bug libstdc++/14493] std::bad_alloc::what() does not explain what happened

2004-04-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement Status|REOPENED|NEW Summary|No std::bad_alloc::what()

[Bug c/6614] [-Wconversion] incorrect conversion warning for function taking a short

2004-04-27 Thread jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
--- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2004-04-27 14:44 --- Subject: Re: [-Wconversion] incorrect conversion warning for function taking a short On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, falk at debian dot org wrote: No, the message really means what it says. This warning was

Results for 3.5.0 20040425 (experimental) testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

2004-04-27 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 25 10:20:49 UTC 2004 Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C compilation failed to produce executable WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.other/enum5.C compilation failed to

Bug#173513: [Bug optimization/9079] [tree-ssa] Inline constant function pointers

2004-04-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||8826 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079