Results for 3.4.1 (Debian 3.4.1-7) testsuite on powerpc-linux

2004-08-20 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Aug 19 08:54:38 UTC 2004 Native configuration is powerpc-linux (voltaire) === gpc tests === Running target any === gpc Summary === # of tests3953 # of expected passes 3948 # of unsupported tests5 /build/buildd/gcc-3.4-

Results for 3.4.1 (Debian 3.4.1-7) testsuite on ia64-linux

2004-08-20 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Aug 19 08:54:38 UTC 2004 Native configuration is ia64-linux (caballero) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: fjf512.pas FAIL: fjf762a.pas FAIL: math.pas === gpc Summary === # of tests3953 # of expected passes 3947 #

Results for 3.4.1 (Debian 3.4.1-7) testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

2004-08-20 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Aug 19 08:54:38 UTC 2004 Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu === libffi tests === Running target unix === libffi Summary === # of expected passes212 # of unsupported tests 2 === libjava tests ==

Re: RFS:cross-compiler package

2004-08-20 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > So i thing that the "perfect" solution would be: > 1) integrate apt-get and dpkg-cross This idea is already around for some months; debian-embedded people have tried to implement it, but I'm not aware of current status. Anyway there's a wishlist b

[Bug java/2499] Class members should be inherited from implemented interfaces

2004-08-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-20 16:05 --- I should note that it now ICE on the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords|

Re: Apt-get gcc not working??

2004-08-20 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 20 August 2004 09:30, Matthias Klose wrote: First, I want to thank you for trying to help me sort this out. I really appreciate it! > which error? what does dpkg -l g++ say? Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed

Re: Apt-get gcc not working??

2004-08-20 Thread Matthias Klose
Michael Satterwhite writes: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Friday 20 August 2004 09:07, you wrote: > > Michael Satterwhite writes: > > > The compiler installed by apt is not usable. When I execute it, I get the > > > message back telling me that cc1plus can't be executed

Re: Apt-get gcc not working??

2004-08-20 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 20 August 2004 09:07, you wrote: > Michael Satterwhite writes: > > The compiler installed by apt is not usable. When I execute it, I get the > > message back telling me that cc1plus can't be executed as it can't be > > found. It seems to me t

Re: Apt-get gcc not working??

2004-08-20 Thread Matthias Klose
Michael Satterwhite writes: > The compiler installed by apt is not usable. When I execute it, I get the > message back telling me that cc1plus can't be executed as it can't be found. > It seems to me that apt *SHOULD* have installed the missing dependency - > whatever it is. Doing an "apt-cache

Bug#267049: gcc-3.4: new multilib on amd64 works - minor patch necessary

2004-08-20 Thread Matthias Klose
Andreas Jochens writes: > * Change MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES from '../lib64 ../lib32' to > '../lib ../lib32' in debian/patches/amd64-biarch.dpatch. added. > Without this change, the gcc-3.4 package FTBFS on amd64 because > all scripts in debian/rules.d expect everything to be in 'lib' > (and

Apt-get gcc not working??

2004-08-20 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm having a problem with apt-get install gcc. I've just installed Debian on a laptop using the new sarge installer RC1. After installation, I've tried to install gcc using apt-get install. Initially I did a search and asked for the latest version.

Bug#267049: gcc-3.4: new multilib on amd64 works - minor patch necessary

2004-08-20 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: gcc-3.4 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch I built the new gcc-3.4 (version -7) for the amd64/gcc-3.4 archive and tested it by e.g. compiling 'grub' with '-m32' and by compiling the new gcc-3.4 with itself. Everything seems to work fine so far. Thank you for your work on this. I had to use

Bug#267024: marked as done (gcc-3.4_3.4.1ds1-7_s390: FTBFS: tar: usr/lib/libgcj.so.5.0.0: Wrote only 9216 of 10240 bytes)

2004-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:07:31 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#267024: gcc-3.4_3.4.1ds1-7_s390: FTBFS: tar: usr/lib/libgcj.so.5.0.0: Wrote only 9216 of 10240 bytes has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Get the yard and patio of your dreams?

2004-08-20 Thread S. Jackson
    and I could see nothing of the high coral walls I had to content I kept my workshop of filthy creation my eyeballs were starting judicial power original or appellate in all cases of law and fact which preexisted in the national organization and life grown whether from my back or my sides as

Bug#267024: gcc-3.4_3.4.1ds1-7_s390: FTBFS: tar: usr/lib/libgcj.so.5.0.0: Wrote only 9216 of 10240 bytes

2004-08-20 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
Package: gcc-3.4 Severity: serious Version: 3.4.1ds1-7 Justification: fails to build from source Full build logs are available on buildd.debian.org. Please refer to the buildd log at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gcc-3.4&ver=3.4.1ds1-7&arch=s390&stamp=1092966367&file=log&as=raw DH_C

V|agra is Lousy cZI

2004-08-20 Thread Corine Galloway
User ID: 9 chamber Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 23:34:28 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--802242432748562979" 802242432748562979 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Gcc The Best 0n|ine Phar-macy is here. Why pay m0re when you