gcc-3.3_3.3.5-1_multi.changes isn't signed with PGP/GnuPG
Removing gcc-3.3_3.3.5-1_multi.changes, but keeping its associated files for
now.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
gcc-3.3_3.3.5-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gij-3.3_3.3.5-1_m68k.deb
treelang-3.3_3.3.5-1_mips.deb
libstdc++5-3.3-dbg_3.3.5-1_alpha.deb
gobjc-3.3_3.3.5-1_m68k.deb
gcj-3.3_3.3.5-1_m68k.deb
protoize_3.3.5-1_m68k.deb
libg2c0_3.3.5-1_m68k.deb
Accepted:
cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.5-1_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.5-1_all.deb
cpp-3.3_3.3.5-1_alpha.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.5-1_alpha.deb
cpp-3.3_3.3.5-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.5-1_i386.deb
cpp-3.3_3.3.5-1_m68k.deb
to
new software for the best price for you
Borland Delphi 7 Professional - 70.00
Norton Internet Security Pro 2004 - 40.00
Linux RedHat 7.3 - 60.00
Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional - 100.00
Quark Express 6.0 - 60.00
Mc Afee SpamKiller 2004 - 20.00
Adobe Premiere Pro 1.5 - 100.00
Adobe Illustrator CS -
Package: cpp-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.4-13
Severity: minor
/usr/share/doc/cpp/cpp symbolic links to itself.
gpk:doc$ ls -l /usr/share/doc/cpp
total 12
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Aug 28 11:58 FAQ.gz - ../gcc-3.3/FAQ.gz
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Aug 28 11:58 README.Bugs - ../gcc-3.3/README.Bugs
Package: gcj-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.4-13
Severity: normal
$ cat Test.java
class Test
{
public static void main(String[] argv)
{
for (char i = '\u'; i '\u'; i++) {
char[] ca = { i };
(new String(ca)).intern();
Hi, here I am again,
Curious...:
$ cat Test.java
class Test
{
public static void main(String[] argv)
{
for (char i = '\u0001'; i = '\u'; i++) {
char[] ca = { i };
System.out.println(Interning the +((int)i)+th
I diffed woody's
gcc-version/gcc-version.tar.bz2/libjava/java/lang/natString.cc with
sarge's, and noticed that in java::lang::String::rehash(), two calls to
_Jv_AllocBytesChecked were replaced by calls to _Jv_AllocBytes (this was
the only change in that function).
Because the deadlock/livelock
Package: gcc
Version: 4:3.3.4-3
Severity: wishlist
Hello dear gcc developers!
May I ask you why gcc doesn't depend on libc6-dev?
Why does it only recommend it?
More and more newbies still ask why do I get :
checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler
cannot create
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:20:07AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:39:08 +0200,
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:18:08AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:24:36 +0200,
Matthias Klose wrote:
The bug submitter claims that a
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is ia64-linux (caballero)
=== gpc tests ===
Running target any
FAIL: arctan.pas
FAIL: fjf512.pas
FAIL: fjf762a.pas
FAIL: math.pas
=== gpc Summary ===
# of tests3910
# of expected passes 3903
# of
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is powerpc-linux (voltaire)
=== gpc tests ===
Running target any
=== gpc Summary ===
# of tests3910
# of expected passes 3905
# of unsupported tests5
/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.5/build/gcc/xgpc version
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is m68k-linux (crest)
=== gpc tests ===
Running target any
FAIL: assumptions.pas
FAIL: capexp.pas
FAIL: cfor.pas
FAIL: emil11a.pas
FAIL: emil11b.pas
FAIL: emil11c.pas
FAIL: emil11d.pas
FAIL: expotst.pas
FAIL: fjf129.pas
FAIL: fjf170.pas
FAIL:
13 matches
Mail list logo
