Any results on Bug # 206281 gcc 3.3..

2004-10-26 Thread anup kumar mittal
Hello, I am facing a similar issue on tru64 Unix platform. Any results or have the bug being resolved.. My errors.. In file included from /opt/TWWfsw/gcc322/lib/gcc-lib/alphaev56-dec-osf5.1/3.2.2/include/time.h:212, from /home/kwhitsett/cleansweep/xmlparser/inc/domc.h:34, from

Bug#278379: Atomic stdc++ operations are broken on some MIPS machines

2004-10-26 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 3.3.5-1 Severity: important While trying to run Debian on a SGI O200 Machine I found out that the inline assembly to handle atomic operations in libstdc++ is broken. The effect is very visible: apt-get update hangs in an endless loop on startup, same for every other c++

Processed: m68k gcc-3.3 __fixunsdfdi problem (Re: Bug#278135: gawk: FTBFS on m68k: clobber.awk test fails with internal error)

2004-10-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 278135 -1 Bug#278135: gawk: FTBFS on m68k: clobber.awk test fails with internal error Bug 278135 cloned as bug 278388. reassign -1 gcc-3.3 Bug#278388: gawk: FTBFS on m68k: clobber.awk test fails with internal error Bug reassigned from package

Processed: Re: Atomic stdc++ operations are broken on some MIPS machines

2004-10-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 278379 +patch Bug#278379: Atomic stdc++ operations are broken on some MIPS machines There were no tags set. Tags added: patch clone 278379 -1 Bug#278379: Atomic stdc++ operations are broken on some MIPS machines Bug 278379 cloned as bug 278409.

Bug#278409: Resend patch for 278409

2004-10-26 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Seems like the BTS hides away patches buried in controls messages. Appended and resent again. Thiemo #! /bin/sh -e # All lines beginning with `# DPATCH:' are a description of the patch. # DP: Fix libstdc++ atomic ops for mips/mipsel dir= if [ $# -eq 3 -a $2 = '-d' ]; then pdir=-d $3

Bug#278409: Resend patch for 278409

2004-10-26 Thread Matthias Klose
Thiemo Seufer writes: Seems like the BTS hides away patches buried in controls messages. Appended and resent again. Thiemo Thiemo, this is your call as a mips maintainer. The patch doesn't change the method how the lock works, so it is compatible with code compiled with the old version of

Bug#278409: Resend patch for 278409

2004-10-26 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Matthias Klose wrote: Thiemo Seufer writes: Seems like the BTS hides away patches buried in controls messages. Appended and resent again. Thiemo Thiemo, this is your call as a mips maintainer. The patch doesn't change the method how the lock works, so it is compatible with code

Results for 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-2) testsuite on mips-linux

2004-10-26 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is mips-linux (casals) === gpc tests === Running target any === gpc Summary === # of tests3910 # of expected passes 3905 # of unsupported tests5 /build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.5/build/gcc/xgpc version