Results for 3.4.4 20041113 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-1) testsuite on m68k-linux

LAST_UPDATED: Sat Nov 13 06:17:59 UTC 2004 Native configuration is m68k-linux (a4000t) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: assumptions.pas FAIL: capexp.pas FAIL: cfor.pas FAIL: emil11a.pas FAIL: emil11b.pas FAIL: emil11c.pas FAIL: emil11d.pas FAIL: emil24.pas FAIL: expots

Results for 3.4.4 20041113 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-1) testsuite on mips-linux

LAST_UPDATED: Sat Nov 13 06:17:59 UTC 2004 Native configuration is mips-linux (denial.cyrius.com) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: adam3i.pas FAIL: adam3j.pas FAIL: adam3o.pas FAIL: adam3p.pas FAIL: assumptions.pas FAIL: binrdwt.pas FAIL: bitfields.pas FAIL: chris4.pas

Results for 3.4.4 20041113 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-1) testsuite on ia64-linux

LAST_UPDATED: Sat Nov 13 06:17:59 UTC 2004 Native configuration is ia64-linux (caballero) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: fjf512.pas FAIL: fjf762a.pas FAIL: math.pas === gpc Summary === # of tests3953 # of expected passes 3947 #

gcc-3.4_3.4.3-1_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.4_3.4.3-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.3-1_hppa.deb fastjar_3.4.3-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/fastjar_3.4.3-1_hppa.deb g++-3.4_3.4.3-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g++-3.4_3.4.3-1_hppa.deb g77-3.4_3.4.3-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g77-3.4_3.4.3

Processing of gcc-3.4_3.4.3-1_hppa.changes

gcc-3.4_3.4.3-1_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.4-base_3.4.3-1_hppa.deb libgcc2_3.4.3-1_hppa.deb cpp-3.4_3.4.3-1_hppa.deb gobjc-3.4_3.4.3-1_hppa.deb gij-3.4_3.4.3-1_hppa.deb libgcj5_3.4.3-1_hppa.deb libgcj5-awt_3.4.3-1_hppa.deb gcj-3.4_3.4

[Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand

--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-11-21 22:59 --- This is the change that triggers the bug: Sun Jul 21 00:54:54 CEST 2002 Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * gcse.c: Include cselib.h (constptop_register): Break out from ... (cprop_insn

gcc-3.4_3.4.3-1_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.4_3.4.3-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.3-1_powerpc.deb fastjar_3.4.3-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/fastjar_3.4.3-1_powerpc.deb g++-3.4_3.4.3-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g++-3.4_3.4.3-1_powerpc.deb g77-3.4_3.4.3-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/

Processing of gcc-3.4_3.4.3-1_powerpc.changes

gcc-3.4_3.4.3-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.4-base_3.4.3-1_powerpc.deb libgcc1_3.4.3-1_powerpc.deb cpp-3.4_3.4.3-1_powerpc.deb gobjc-3.4_3.4.3-1_powerpc.deb gij-3.4_3.4.3-1_powerpc.deb libgcj5_3.4.3-1_powerpc.deb libgcj5-awt_3.4.3-1_p

[Bug target/18590] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in add_insn_before, at emit-rtl.c:3599

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone|--- |3.4.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to work|3.2.3 |3.2.3 4.0.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/14838] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE when building with -O2 -g

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-21 14:26 --- *** Bug 18593 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14838 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug target/18593] [3.3 / 3.4 regression] ICE in insn_default_length, at insn-attrtab.c:825

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-21 14:26 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14838 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/18589] could optimize FP multiplies better

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-21 14:24 --- Confirmed. Actually the most optimial code would be: mulsd %xmm1, %xmm0 mulsd %xmm0, %xmm0 mulsd %xmm0, %xmm0 aka (foo*bar)^4 -- What|Removed

[Bug libfortran/18591] gfortran: internal error with namelist

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-21 14:15 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4/4.0 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-21 14:10 --- *** Bug 18588 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/18588] [3.4 4.0 regression] -O2 disables warning "control reaches end of non-void function"

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-21 14:10 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 13000 *** -- What|Removed |Added

Bug#255100: marked as done (quantlib FTBFS on amd64: files not found.)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:22:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#255100: quantlib FTBFS on amd64: files not found. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #272673 to gcc-gnats as PR 18593

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #272673 to gcc-gnats as PR 18593 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18593 > forwarded 272673 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18593 Bug#272673: freebsd-buildutils_5.2.1+20040403-11_hppa: FTBFS: unrecognizable insn Noted your statement that Bug has

Bug#262202: marked as done (locale-related segfault with libstdc++.so.5)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:33:41 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#262202: locale-related segfault with libstdc++.so.5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#268808: marked as done (g++ package doesn't install)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:16:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line g++ package doesn't install has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#256024: gcc: compile time multiplied by a factor of 8

Please recheck with recent gcc versions (gcc-3.4.x).

Bug#261893: kernel-image-2.6.6-1-generic: Kernel bug at mm/slab.c:1530

How did you solve this problem? Does gcc-3.3.5 fix it, or do you work around it by compiling with other options / another compiler?

Bug#262202: locale-related segfault with libstdc++.so.5

Is this still an issue? Kim Saunders writes: > Package: libstdc++5 > Version: 1:3.3.4-6 > > After having dist-upgraded to the version of libstdc++5 mentioned above > this morning, all of my programs that dynamically link against > /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 suffer from (seemingly locale-related) seg

Bug#262441: g++-3.3: ICE in lookup_tempate_function

Please could you update the report, using g++-3.4.3 from unstable and maybe g++-4.0, currently available from http://people.debian.org/~doko/gcc-3.4/ Thanks, Matthias

Bug#263440: marked as done (g++-3.3: Reporting of undeclared identifiers: one report per class only)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:52:33 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Reporting of undeclared identifiers: one report per class only has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: reassign bug to binutils

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 262710 binutils Bug#262710: gcc-3.3: [sparc] -frename-registers produces wrong code Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.3' to `binutils'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: tag gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 266110 + fixed-upstream Bug#266110: undefined symbols when using specials char_traits There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-upstream > tags 266110 + upstream Bug#266110: undefined symbols when using specials char_traits Tags were: fixed-upstre

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #270340 to gcc-gnats as PR 18592

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #270340 to gcc-gnats as PR 18592 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18592 > forwarded 270340 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18592 Bug#270340: gcc-3.3: [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand Noted your statement that Bug has be

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #277845 to gcc-gnats as PR 18591

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #277845 to gcc-gnats as PR 18591 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18591 > forwarded 277845 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18591 Bug#277845: gfortran-4.0: internal error with namelist Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

Bug#258535: marked as done (gcc-3.3: Segfault on linux-2.6.7 scripts/basic/fixdep)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:04:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#258535: gcc-3.3: Segfault on linux-2.6.7 scripts/basic/fixdep has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#258531: marked as done (gcc-3.3: Segfault on linux-2.6.7 scripts/basic/fixdep)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:04:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#258535: gcc-3.3: Segfault on linux-2.6.7 scripts/basic/fixdep has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#256741: marked as done ([IA64] Segfaults dereferencing string varargs.)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:12:06 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [IA64] Segfaults dereferencing string varargs. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #262658 to gcc-gnats as PR 18590

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #262658 to gcc-gnats as PR 18590 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18590 > forwarded 262658 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18590 Bug#262658: [m68k] ICE in add_insn_before, at emit-rtl.c:3599 building logrotate Noted your statement that Bug has be

Bug#272908: marked as done ("g++: Internal error: Illegal instruction (program as)" even on simple programs)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2004 11:21:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#272908: "g++: Internal error: Illegal instruction (program as)" even on simple programs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#269228: marked as done (gcc-3.3: displays error and quits when trying to compile anything)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2004 11:23:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#269228: gcc-3.3: displays error and quits when trying to compile anything has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#268080: marked as done (limits.h: Tries to include nonexitent headers linux/errno.h and linux/limits.h)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2004 11:24:35 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#268080: limits.h: Tries to include nonexitent headers linux/errno.h and linux/limits.h has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#256668: marked as done (g++-3.3 report internal error even on simplest program)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2004 11:01:40 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing report as unreproducible has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Processed: tagging gcc reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 281445 + upstream Bug#281445: gcc-3.3: generated object file cannot be linked There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > tags 281445 + fixed-upstream Bug#281445: gcc-3.3: generated object file cannot be linked Tags were: upstream Tags added: f

Processed: correctly forward bug report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 281602 libgcj5: SocketChannel.get(ByteBuffer) returns 0 at EOF. Bug#281602: [PR 18588] -O2 disables warning "control reaches end of non-void function" Changed Bug title. > unforwarded 281602 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

Processed: fixed gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 275408 + fixed-upstream Bug#275408: ICE: in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:12375 Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-upstream > tags 275408 + upstream Bug#275408: ICE: in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:12375 Tags were: fixed-upstream experim

Bug#242432: marked as done ([fixed in 3.4.1, libstdc++/15123] libstdc++-doc: Allocators.3 manpage is empty)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2004 10:32:10 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in recent libstdc++6-doc: Allocators.3 manpage is empty has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: retitle gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 280803 gcc docs considered non-free in terms of the DFSG (licensed > under the GNU FDL) Bug#280803: libgcc1: contains non-free GNU FDL Changed Bug title. > tags 280803 + sarge-ignore Bug#280803: gcc docs considered non-free in terms of the DFS

Bug#267206: marked as done (gcc-3.4: vector op code generation regression)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2004 10:18:42 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-3.4.3: vector op code generation regression has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #268115 to gcc-gnats as PR 18589

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #268115 to gcc-gnats as PR 18589 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18589 > forwarded 268115 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18589 Bug#268115: gcc-3.4: could optimize FP multiplies better Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://g

Processed: tag gcc report as wontfix

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 265318 + wontfix Bug#265318: gcc-3.4: Doesn't provide a /usr/bin/cc alternative There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #281602 to gcc-gnats as PR 18588

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #281602 to gcc-gnats as PR 18588 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18588 > forwarded 281602 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18588 Bug#281602: libgcj5: SocketChannel.get(ByteBuffer) returns 0 at EOF. Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded

Processed: Re: Bug#281847: g++-3.4: g++ does not check arguments to fprintf

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 281847 [fixed in g++-4.0] g++ does not check arguments to fprintf Bug#281847: g++-3.4: g++ does not check arguments to fprintf Changed Bug title. > tags 281847 + upstream Bug#281847: [fixed in g++-4.0] g++ does not check arguments to fprintf Th