--- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2004-12-13 09:14
---
And you also need -m68020 to trigger the bug. Works
fine with -m68000, so the bug must hide in one of the
TARGET_68020 patterns.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592
--- You are
--- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2004-12-13 09:29
---
It happens both on ColdFire and 680x0 (x=2), but not
on 68000.
output_addr_const() gets passed a TRUNCATE (HImode) rtx.
I could find it in the last dump before the ICE:
(insn 87 45 127 3 (set (reg:HI 0 %d0
Think getting a 1.95% ra . t e is impossible?
Think AGAIN!
We can offer you the absolute rock-bottom lowe s t ra t e,g u a ranteed.
We work with all c r edit types. Visit our site now
http://www.theseto.com/
Malinda Vigil
of elves. for univac
via indefatigable, proscription
--- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2004-12-13 09:44
---
*** Bug 18542 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2004-12-13 09:45
---
Please see additional comments attached to PR18542:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18542
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-13
10:19 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
And you also need -m68020 to trigger the bug. Works
fine with -m68000, so the bug must hide in one of the
TARGET_68020 patterns.
Note: PR 18542 also covers avr-* targets.
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-12-13 10:38 ---
I.e. though this PR and PR18542 might be the same for the m68k, I doubt this
bug
to be identical to the ICE on the avr.
You can easily check that by testing if reverting the patch from comment #2
helps.
Hi Matthias,
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:55:57 +0100, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Matthias with the patch attached and an updated gcc-3.3 package,
Matthias libunwind support for ia64 seems to work for me. I
Matthias couldn't install any of the built packages. I'd like to
David Mosberger writes:
I wanted to try this but found that the gcc-3.3 has a libgcc1 package
for hppa only. Is this intentional? I thought a new libgcc1 package
for ia64 was needed so we pick up the libunwind built from the
libunwind sources.
please get the libgcc1 package from the
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:47:41 +0100, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Matthias please get the libgcc1 package from the unstable
Matthias distribution.
I think I've got that one already (libgcc1 v3.4.3-2).
Matthias It's currently built by the gcc-3.4 sources and includes
Matthias
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2004-12-13 20:36 ---
Should be fixed with today's checkin to tree-ssa-dom.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18694
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn|18241 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18694
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-13
21:01 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From sxanth at ceid dot upatras dot gr 2004-12-13
22:25 ---
This is present in 3.4 too
static inline int foo ()
{
return 100;
}
typedef int (*fptr)();
static const fptr a [] = { foo };
static inline int
Dear friendly Debian GCC folks,
I believe I've encountered this bug as well. Here's the scenario: I'm
starting to work on a package (homework, so I'm starting with half a dozen
source files alreay), tinkering away, happily compiling, when suddenly:
In file included from
15 matches
Mail list logo
