Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 284821 -1
Bug#284821: libbz2-dev: libbz2 fails to link statically
Bug 284821 cloned as bug 289274.
reassign -1 gcc-doc
Bug#289274: libbz2-dev: libbz2 fails to link statically
Bug reassigned from package `libbz2-dev' to `gcc-doc'.
severity -1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package gcc-doc
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gcc-doc
severity 289274 important
Bug#289274: When linking statically, you need to order dependent pieces of code
first
Severity set to `important'.
tags 289274 -fixed
Bug#289274: When linking
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:04:36 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed: gcc-doc: 289274: severity important, tags -fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
$B$O$8$a$F$4O"Mm$5$;[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B2q0wHV9f(B1648$B$N(B
(B
$B2,ED=cF`$H?=$7$^$9!#(B
(B
$B0JA0$K(B1$BEYCmJ8$5$;[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B:#2s(B2$BEYL\$J$N$G$9$,!"(B
$BCmJ8$+$i0l=54V7P$A$^$9$,[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B>$NJ}$,FO$+$J$$$_$?$$$J$N$G$9$,!"(B
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:28:21 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#288817: apt-get and aptitude segfault on hppa
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jan 2005 10:32:38 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#187564: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jan 2005 10:32:38 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#286840: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Accepted:
cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.5-6_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.5-6_all.deb
cpp-3.3_3.3.5-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.5-6_i386.deb
fixincludes_3.3.5-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3.5-6_i386.deb
g++-3.3_3.3.5-6_i386.deb
to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 277206 [fixed in 3.4] ICE (segfault) while compiling Linux 2.6.9
Bug#277206: gcc-3.3: internal error (segfault) while compiling Linux 2.6.9
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:01:04 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative
system
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 288739 gcc-2.95
Bug#288739: gcc optimization bug
Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `gcc-2.95'.
tags 288739 + wontfix
Bug#288739: gcc optimization bug
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
tags 288739 + fixed-upstream
Bug#288739:
reassign 288739 gcc-2.95
tags 288739 + wontfix
tags 288739 + fixed-upstream
retitle 288739 [fixed in 3.x] gcc-2.95 optimizes the arithmetic overflow check
away
thanks
Indeed. This is fixed in the 3.x series. I suggest upgrading, since it
seems unlikely
that somebody will find and backport
Michiel Vugteveen writes:
-Original message-
Van: Matthias Klose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 5 januari 2005 1:43
Aan: Michiel Vugteveen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: Bug#288670: bug libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-5
Michiel Vugteveen writes:
Package: libstdc++5
Good day:
I tried to call your 3 three time but your phone is not available. I think
you did a mistake during filling the form. Anyway, your mortgagge request
#4209 was appproved with 3.6, please reenter your info here
and we will start ASAP:
http://www.htloti.com/
Thank you
Chester Shapiro
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:31:54 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.3.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:37:25 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#287584: GCC: Missing /usr/share/man/man1/g++.1.gz and
/usr/man/man1/cc.1.gz
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 278807 wishlist
Bug#278807: libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1: Do not remove in Sarge!
Severity set to `wishlist'.
reassign 278807 wnpp
Bug#278807: libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1: Do not remove in Sarge!
Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1' to
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jan 7 05:58:17 UTC 2005
Native configuration is i486-linux (cachaca)
=== gpc tests ===
Running target any
=== gpc Summary ===
# of tests3910
# of expected passes 3909
# of unsupported tests1
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-09
02:12 ---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00464.html.
--
What|Removed |Added
19 matches
Mail list logo
