Bonjourno. These Lonely women want some hot lovin,...,,cahoot conakry

2005-02-23 Thread Virgil Malone
What up. What are you searching for? To have fun tonight. To know love again. To rail someone. Companionship. All of these Lonely moms want someone to bang them. Ill see you later. http://pfnunc.poetruincb.com/gab/hph09 _

ALL of these Unspoken for people would like someone to show them a good time,..,..involution gray

2005-02-23 Thread Amanda Browne
Hi u. What is is that you want? A sweet time tonight. A romantic dream. To rail someone. Someone to hold. Every single one of these Hottie moms want someone to be naughty with. Take care for now. http://duqcz.zedforsure.com/gab/dhw3

[Bug c++/19004] ICE in uses_template_parms at cp/pt.c:4860

2005-02-23 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 10:23 --- The problem reappeared today :-( -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/19004] ICE in uses_template_parms at cp/pt.c:4860

2005-02-23 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.0.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19004 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

Bug#296567: fastjar: Give reasonable version number on -V, manpage bug

2005-02-23 Thread Markus Schaber
Package: fastjar Version: 1:3.4.3-6 Severity: minor Is it possible to make fastjar -V spit out reasonable version numbers? Currently, both debian woody fastjar and debian sarge fastjar, while having a different feature set (woody does not support -u), both identify themselves as 0.92-gcc,

[Bug libffi/12782] ffi.h #defines ffi_type_[us]long wrong on 32bit arches

2005-02-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Component|other |libffi http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12782 --- You are receiving this mail because:

Bug#296456: Acknowledgement (java wrapper script mishandles command line options with arguments)

2005-02-23 Thread Olly Betts
I think there's a bug in my patch - on further reading it seems -jar just controls the interpretation of the first non-option argument rather than taking an argument itself... If that's the case, the test for -jar or -D* should remain unchanged. Cheers, Olly -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Need Soft?

2005-02-23 Thread Lidia S. Schulz, III
Popular cheap soft below: http://anagram.weighedinatmore.com/?a=409 9