--
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|3.3 3.4.0 3.4.4 4.0.0 4.1.0 |3.3 3.4.0 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.4
||4.0.0 4.1.0
Target
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|3.4.3 |3.3.5 3.3.6 3.4.3
Known to work|3.3 3.4.0 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.4 |3.3 3.3.4 3.4.0 3.4.1 3.4.2
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-02 13:32
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21334 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Brodwyn Lyndon writes:
Hi. I am a research student at the University of Cape Town, South Africa.
I am trying to install a speech software environment that requires
gcc3.2 (higer versions give compilation errors).
Would it be possible to make it, with it's dependencies available to me,
gcc-3.4_3.4.3-12.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-3.4_3.4.3-12.1.dsc
gcc-3.4_3.4.3-12.1.diff.gz
cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.3-12.1_all.deb
libgcj5-common_3.4.3-12.1_all.deb
libstdc++6-doc_3.4.3-12.1_all.deb
g77-3.4-doc_3.4.3-12.1_all.deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 302995 + fixed
Bug#302995: fastjar: postinst does not check for errors
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
tag 307241 + fixed
Bug#307241: gcc-3.4: FTBFS: doxygen segfault processing libstdc++v3 headers
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Your message dated Mon, 2 May 2005 19:46:13 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#307111: gcc-4.0: Missing lsb-release build dependency
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
tags 306280 + unreproducible
thanks
the package was uploaded for powerpc in experimental. I am unable to
reproduce this error as well.
Rene Engelhard writes:
Package: gcc-4.0
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
[...]
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 306280 + unreproducible
Bug#306280: FTBFS: libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library object
from `'
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: unreproducible
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Your message dated Mon, 2 May 2005 18:46:02 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line GCC default version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 165635 + fixed-upstream
Bug#165635: [fixed in 4.1] [PR java/8608] segmentation fault on compiling bad
program
Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
retitle 165635 [fixed in 4.1] segmentation fault on compiling bad program
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 292958 + fixed-upstream
Bug#292958: [PR 20046] [3.3 regression] [powerpc-linux] 3.3 CVS miscompiles
bind 9.3.0
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
tags 292958 + wontfix
Bug#292958: [PR 20046] [3.3 regression] [powerpc-linux] 3.3 CVS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 285692 + fixed-upstream
Bug#285692: [PR 19006] [3.3 / 3.4 / 4.0 regression] ICE in tree_low_cst, at
tree.c:3255
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
tags 285692 + wontfix
Bug#285692: [PR 19006] [3.3 / 3.4 / 4.0 regression] ICE in
- which is the last version that built on hurd-i386?
- does gcc-4.0 (experimental) build?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 200392 [fixed in 3.4/4.0] [PR 11459] -stdc=c90 -pedantic warns about
C90's non long-long support when in C99 mode
Bug#200392: [fixed in 4.0] [PR 11459] -stdc=c90 -pedantic warns about C90's non
long-long support when in C99 mode
Changed Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 254659 [fixed in 4.0] [PR 16066] i386 loop strength reduction bug
Bug#254659: [PR 16066] i386 loop strength reduction bug
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
fastjar_3.4.3-12.1_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the
Accepted:
cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.3-12.1_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.3-12.1_all.deb
cpp-3.4_3.4.3-12.1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.3-12.1_i386.deb
fastjar_3.4.3-12.1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/fastjar_3.4.3-12.1_i386.deb
g++-3.4_3.4.3-12.1_i386.deb
to
All the meds you need:
http://www.salver.info/?Cvsbook
Bennett
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All the meds you need:
http://www.salver.info/?Gtkada
Lana
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 matches
Mail list logo