Processing of gcc-3.3_3.3.6-3_i386.changes

gcc-3.3_3.3.6-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.3_3.3.6-3.dsc gcc-3.3_3.3.6-3.diff.gz cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.6-3_all.deb libgcj4-common_3.3.6-3_all.deb libgcj-common_3.3.6-3_all.deb libstdc++5-3.3-doc_3.3.6-3_all.deb g77-3.3-doc_3.3.6-3_all.deb

Bug#302995: marked as done (fastjar: postinst does not check for errors)

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2005 11:14:20 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.4-3.4.3-12.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#307241: marked as done (gcc-3.4: FTBFS: doxygen segfault processing libstdc++v3 headers)

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2005 11:12:58 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.4 3.4.3-12.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

gcc-3.3_3.3.6-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.6-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.6-3_all.deb cpp-3.3_3.3.6-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.6-3_i386.deb fixincludes_3.3.6-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3.6-3_i386.deb g++-3.3_3.3.6-3_i386.deb to

Bug#305690: marked as done (gcc-4.0: Please change the Build-Depends)

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2005 11:15:17 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 4.0.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

c++ STL namespaces, which file is included?

Synopsis: STL namespaces, which file is included? Severity: medium Priority: medium Category: c++ c Release: g++-3.3 (GCC) 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-1) Environment: Linux Charon 2.6.10 i686 GNU/Linux Architecture: i686 Hi, I'm sorry to have to repeat a question which was posed in January 2004 by

binutils-2.16

Hi, I've put experimental packages for binutils-2.16 at http://people.debian.org/~doko/binutils I'm not uploading to experimental, as you cannot discover, if somebody uploads packages to sid with the experimental binutils installed. Thiemo, please could you check, if I correctly merged the

Processing of gcc-3.3_3.3.6-3.0.1_i386.changes

gcc-3.3_3.3.6-3.0.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.6-3.0.1_all.deb libgcj4-common_3.3.6-3.0.1_all.deb libgcj-common_3.3.6-3.0.1_all.deb libstdc++5-3.3-doc_3.3.6-3.0.1_all.deb g77-3.3-doc_3.3.6-3.0.1_all.deb

gcc-3.3_3.3.6-3.0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.6-3.0.1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.6-3.0.1_all.deb cpp-3.3_3.3.6-3.0.1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.6-3.0.1_i386.deb fixincludes_3.3.6-3.0.1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3.6-3.0.1_i386.deb

Results for 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-3) testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: initexc execution - gij test FAIL: initexc execution - gij test === libjava Summary === # of expected passes2987 # of unexpected failures

Results for 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-3) testsuite on i486-linux

LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is i486-linux (cachaca) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: fjf1021d.pas FAIL: fjf1021h.pas FAIL: fjf1021i.pas FAIL: fjf1021j.pas FAIL: fjf1021k.pas === gpc Summary === # of tests4946 # of expected

Results for 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-3) testsuite on powerpc-linux

LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is powerpc-linux (voltaire) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: chief56.pas FAIL: fjf1021d.pas FAIL: fjf1021h.pas FAIL: fjf1021i.pas FAIL: fjf1021j.pas FAIL: fjf1021k.pas FAIL: fjf998r.pas === gpc Summary === # of

Results for 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-3) testsuite on ia64-linux

LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is ia64-linux (caballero) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: arp1.pas FAIL: chief40.pas FAIL: chief56.pas FAIL: chuck6.pas FAIL: fieldw.pas FAIL: fjf1000.pas FAIL: fjf1021d.pas FAIL: fjf1021h.pas FAIL: fjf1021i.pas FAIL: fjf1021j.pas

Results for 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13) testsuite on i486-linux

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Mar 14 00:26:27 UTC 2005 Native configuration is i486-linux (cachaca) === gpc tests === Running target any === gpc Summary === # of tests3953 # of expected passes 3952 # of unsupported tests1

Results for 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13) testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Mar 14 00:26:27 UTC 2005 Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu === libffi tests === Running target unix === libffi Summary === # of expected passes212 # of unsupported tests 2 === libjava tests

Results for 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13) testsuite on ia64-linux

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Mar 14 00:26:27 UTC 2005 Native configuration is ia64-linux (caballero) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: fjf512.pas FAIL: fjf762a.pas FAIL: math.pas === gpc Summary === # of tests3953 # of expected passes 3947 #

Results for 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13) testsuite on mipsel-linux

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Mar 14 00:26:27 UTC 2005 Native configuration is mipsel-linux (rem) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: adam3i.pas FAIL: adam3j.pas FAIL: adam3o.pas FAIL: adam3p.pas FAIL: assumptions.pas FAIL: binrdwt.pas FAIL: bitfields.pas FAIL: chris4.pas FAIL:

Results for 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13) testsuite on powerpc-linux

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Mar 14 00:26:27 UTC 2005 Native configuration is powerpc-linux (voltaire) === gpc tests === Running target any === gpc Summary === # of tests3953 # of expected passes 3948 # of unsupported tests5

Results for 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13) testsuite on s390-linux

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Mar 14 00:26:27 UTC 2005 Native configuration is s390-linux (debian01) === gpc tests === Running target any === gpc Summary === # of tests3953 # of expected passes 3948 # of unsupported tests5

Re: Compiling Kernel with Dynamic Module Loading Enabled

Is there more of a newbie group with less traffic that I might be able to ask this kind of question on? Thanks, Tony Vandiver - Original Message - From: Tony Vandiver [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-gcc@lists.debian.org Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 8:08 PM Subject: Compiling Kernel with

Top 10 popular pharmacy drugs

ePills http://xwfog.eth70fw7bow40fe.areaneebek.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]