Aaron M. Ucko writes:
Package: libgcj6
Severity: normal
For some reason, it is libgcj6 rather than libgcj6-dev that conflicts
with libgcj4-dev and libgcj5-dev.
why do you think so?
$ dpkg -L libgcj6
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/libgcj6
/usr/share/doc/libgcj6/README
Package: gij-4.0
Version: 4.0.0-9
Severity: important
My m68k buildd failed to build java-gcj-compat_1.0.28-5 because of this problem:
Setting up gij-4.0 (4.0.0-9) ...
Exception during runtime
Christian T. Steigies writes:
Package: gij-4.0
Version: 4.0.0-9
Severity: important
My m68k buildd failed to build java-gcj-compat_1.0.28-5 because of this
problem:
Setting up gij-4.0 (4.0.0-9) ...
Exception during runtime initialization
/var/lib/dpkg/info/gij-4.0.postinst: line 8:
soft at incredibly low prices
A contented mind is a continual feast.
A single day is enough to make us a little larger.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
why do you think so?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
$ apt-cache show libgcj6 | grep -i conflicts
Conflicts: libgcj5-dev, libgcj4-dev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
$ apt-cache show libgcj6-dev | grep -i conflicts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at
Rolex watch was never this cheap !
http://urwatchguy4u.net
no thanks-
http://www.enhancemetoday.com/rlink/
nanosecond middlebury haag
administratrix ameliorate iceberg
cornelia
clamp
ieee quarry lykes
exasperate clint gonzalez
ambrose doherty
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I upgraded the P III box from woody to sarge, which changed the g77
compiler version from 2.95 to 3.3 -- and the bug seems to be gone.
-- A. T. Young
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 01:58:30PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Christian T. Steigies writes:
Package: gij-4.0
Version: 4.0.0-9
Severity: important
My m68k buildd failed to build java-gcj-compat_1.0.28-5 because of this
problem:
Setting up gij-4.0 (4.0.0-9) ...
Exception
Christian T. Steigies writes:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 01:58:30PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Christian T. Steigies writes:
Package: gij-4.0
Version: 4.0.0-9
Severity: important
My m68k buildd failed to build java-gcj-compat_1.0.28-5 because of this
problem:
Setting
Get the Finest Rolex Watch Replica !
We only sell premium watches. There's no battery in these replicas
just like the real ones since they charge themselves as you move.
The second hand moves JUST like the real ones, too.
These original watches sell in stores for thousands of dollars.
We
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 01:15:30AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
Running it from gdb now, it seems to take a LOT longer...
Starting program: /usr/bin/gcj-dbtool-4.0 -n /var/lib/gcj-4.0/classmap.db
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 16384 (LWP 4569)]
[New Thread
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:57:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
it looks like you didn't comment out the call in the postinst. please
do so. run gcj-dbtool by hand, with the -dbg package installed and
from gdb. A stack trace would be nice.
Right, since it did not help, after commenting it
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: calls run
FAIL: cxxtest run
FAIL: field run
FAIL: final_method run
FAIL: findclass run
FAIL: invoke run
FAIL: martin run
FAIL: noclass run
FAIL: overload run
FAIL:
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is m68k-linux (a4000t)
=== gpc tests ===
Running target any
FAIL: chief56.pas
FAIL: fjf1021d.pas
FAIL: fjf1021h.pas
FAIL: fjf1021i.pas
FAIL: fjf1021j.pas
FAIL: fjf1021k.pas
FAIL: fjf1044s.pas
FAIL: marco1.pas
FAIL: tsmul.pas
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 5 11:57:12 UTC 2005
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c (test for excess errors)
WARNING: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL:
Hello,
I'm doing security experiments on Debian Sarge. I need to compile
all packages under gcc 3.4 instead of gcc 3.3. (The C++ analysis
tool can parse g++ 3.4 headers but not g++ 3.3 headers.) Is there
any reason this won't work, excepting a small number of
idiosyncratic packages?
Since I'm
Get the Finest Rolex Watch Replica !
We only sell premium watches. There's no battery in these replicas
just like the real ones since they charge themselves as you move.
The second hand moves JUST like the real ones, too.
These original watches sell in stores for thousands of dollars.
We
17 matches
Mail list logo
