Accepted:
cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.4-2_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.4-2_all.deb
cpp-3.4_3.4.4-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.4-2_i386.deb
g++-3.4_3.4.4-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g++-3.4_3.4.4-2_i386.deb
g77-3.4-doc_3.4.4-2_all.deb
to
gcc-defaults_1.22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-defaults_1.22.dsc
gcc-defaults_1.22.tar.gz
cpp_3.3.6-1_i386.deb
cpp-doc_3.3.6-1_i386.deb
gcc_3.3.6-1_i386.deb
gcc-doc_3.3.6-1_i386.deb
g++_3.3.6-1_i386.deb
gobjc_3.3.6-1_i386.deb
Accepted:
chill_2.95.4-37_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-37_i386.deb
cpp-doc_3.3.6-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp-doc_3.3.6-1_i386.deb
cpp_3.3.6-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.3.6-1_i386.deb
g++_3.3.6-1_i386.deb
to
Get the Finest Rolex Watch Replica !
We only sell premium watches. There's no battery in these replicas
just like the real ones since they charge themselves as you move.
The second hand moves JUST like the real ones, too.
These original watches sell in stores for thousands of dollars.
We
Accepted:
cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.4-3_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.4-3_all.deb
cpp-3.4_3.4.4-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.4-3_i386.deb
g++-3.4_3.4.4-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g++-3.4_3.4.4-3_i386.deb
g77-3.4-doc_3.4.4-3_all.deb
to
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:17:29 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#315751: fixed in gcc-3.4 3.4.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 10:52:30PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Looks like a configure error. -V expects the version as an
argument. Do you really need to use -V at all?
I was just building the packages. You need to ask the package
maintainer why they used -V. (Strace package maintainer
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:36:09 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#307868: gcc-3.3: request for additional link in
/usr/lib/gcc-lib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:33:55 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 01:10:33 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#310167: gcc-3.3: debian/patches/autoreconf.dpatch does not
fail on error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Euh Nor reply ? I did send a reply.
Check below transcript
On Monday 27 June 2005 23:48, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#307868: gcc-3.3: request for additional link in /usr/lib/gcc-lib,
which was filed against the gcc-3.3
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 01:21:07 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg (4.0.0-11)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 01:55:13 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed gcc-4.0 reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
THIS IS GOING TO BE OUR ABSOLUTE ATTEMPT
We have endevored to speak to you on many periods and we await your response
now!
Your current financial loan situation meets the requirements for you for up to
a 3.10% lower rate.
However, based on the fact that our previous attempts to speak to you
14 matches
Mail list logo
