Bug#319570: g++-4.0: ICE: Segmentation fault

2005-07-23 Thread Matthias Klose
Brian M. Carlson writes: Package: g++-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-2 Severity: important Justification: may break C++ transition of libcrypto++ -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -frepo -Wno-unused -Werror -MT

[Bug target/22627] [4.1 regression, hppa] bootstrap error

2005-07-23 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-23 13:17 --- Subject: Re: New: [4.1 regression, hppa] bootstrap error On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org wrote: ../../src/gcc/crtstuff.c:489: internal compiler error: tree check: expected

Bug#319616: add -DDEBIAN flag

2005-07-23 Thread Robert Millan
Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi! It seems defining the DEBIAN macro in source packages has become a common trend. I could find around 60 packages that define this or equivalent macros (the most common one being DEBIAN). What would you think of standarising

[Bug target/22627] [4.1 regression, hppa] bootstrap error

2005-07-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-23 15:23 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22577 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/22577] [4.1 Regression] PA bootstrap fails

2005-07-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-23 15:23 --- *** Bug 22627 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

Bug#319616: marked as done (add -DDEBIAN flag)

2005-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jul 2005 19:04:06 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#319616: add -DDEBIAN flag has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Re: Bug#317082: libc6-s390x: missing depends on lib64gcc1

2005-07-23 Thread GOTO Masanori
reassign 317082 dpkg-dev thanks Summary: The bug submitted in #317082 that requests adding Depends: lib64gcc1 to libc6-s390x on s390. However the bug submitted in #258647 that requests removing Depends: lib64gcc1 to libc6-sparc64 on sparc. Both bugs are conflicted because both

[Bug target/22577] [4.1 Regression] PA bootstrap fails

2005-07-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-23 21:36 --- Subject: Bug 22577 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-23 21:36:40 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/pa :

[Bug target/22577] [4.1 Regression] PA bootstrap fails

2005-07-23 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-07-23 21:37 --- Thanks Steve! -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

Re: Bug #319255

2005-07-23 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Matthias Klose wrote: it's pending an upload (as the definition of pending in the BTS suggests). I'm sure you did read as well http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg00013.html Oh bleck. I forgot about that. Of course nothing can happen until that's dealt with. :-P At any