Brian M. Carlson writes:
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-2
Severity: important
Justification: may break C++ transition of libcrypto++
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -O2
-frepo -Wno-unused -Werror -MT
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-23
13:17 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.1 regression, hppa] bootstrap error
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org wrote:
../../src/gcc/crtstuff.c:489: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi!
It seems defining the DEBIAN macro in source packages has become a common
trend. I could find around 60 packages that define this or equivalent macros
(the most common one being DEBIAN).
What would you think of standarising
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-23
15:23 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22577 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-23
15:23 ---
*** Bug 22627 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jul 2005 19:04:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#319616: add -DDEBIAN flag
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
reassign 317082 dpkg-dev
thanks
Summary:
The bug submitted in #317082 that requests adding Depends:
lib64gcc1 to libc6-s390x on s390. However the bug submitted in
#258647 that requests removing Depends: lib64gcc1 to libc6-sparc64
on sparc. Both bugs are conflicted because both
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-23
21:36 ---
Subject: Bug 22577
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-23 21:36:40
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/config/pa :
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-07-23
21:37 ---
Thanks Steve!
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Matthias Klose wrote:
it's pending an upload (as the definition of pending in the BTS
suggests). I'm sure you did read as well
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg00013.html
Oh bleck. I forgot about that. Of course nothing can happen until that's
dealt with. :-P At any
10 matches
Mail list logo