[Bug java/2499] Class members should be inherited from implemented interfaces

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-10 23:55 --- And now it just rejects it. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code

Bug#322482: Please make libstdc++6-dev standard and libstdc++5-3.3-dev optional

Package: ftp.debian.org,libstdc++6-dev,libstdc++5-3.3-dev Severity: minor Hello, I think that the priorities of libstdc++5-3.3-dev and libstdc++6-dev should be interchanged now that GCC 4.0 is our default compiler. So: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: standard -> optional libstdc++6-dev: opti

gcc-snapshot_20050726-1_sparc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20050726-1_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20050726-1_sparc.deb Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of gcc-snapshot_20050726-1_sparc.changes

gcc-snapshot_20050726-1_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-snapshot_20050726-1_sparc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322218: more robust code (gcc -O2 optimization bug)

On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:47 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > Hi, > > in floating point code is better to avoid testing with equality. > In your example, you should change > > if (fa == 0.0) > if (fb == 0.0) > > into: > > if (fabs(fa) < DBL_EPSILON) > if (fabs(fb) < DBL_EPSILON) > > After that,

Bug#322218: more robust code (gcc -O2 optimization bug)

Hi, in floating point code is better to avoid testing with equality. In your example, you should change if (fa == 0.0) if (fb == 0.0) into: if (fabs(fa) < DBL_EPSILON) if (fabs(fb) < DBL_EPSILON) After that, it works with gcc -O2. Regards Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t