Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 322766 - experimental
Bug#322766: jc1: internal compiler error: segmentation fault
Tags were: experimental
Tags removed: experimental
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
tags 322766 - experimental
thanks
andyp writes:
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-4
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
When trying to compile jjtag, an ejtag program, the following happens
on two different systems both running this version of GCC.
which version of jjtag, where can I find
martin f krafft writes:
Package: libstdc++6-4.0-dbg, gdb
Severity: minor
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 46912505584352 (LWP 21298)]
0x2ad69a65 in sentry (this=0x7fffdf00, [EMAIL PROTECTED])
at ostream.tcc:55
55 ostream.tcc: No
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 323646 4.0.1-5
Bug#323646: gcc-4.0: -O1 -msse2 -ftree-vectorize breaks certain code
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 4.0.1-5, send any further explanations to
Alexander
close 323646 4.0.1-5
thanks
fixed at least in gcc-4.0_4.0.1-5
Alexander Toresson writes:
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-2
Severity: normal
When compiled with -O1 -msse2 -ftree-vectorize, the following code
snippet segfaults on data[i] = 1;:
#include stdlib.h
void *NM_First;
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:58:22 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gcj: compiling google api demo crashes compiler
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:48:37 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#320726: gcc-4.0: mmx, sse asm need -mmmx, -msse
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# submitted Debian report #301746 to gcc-gnats as PR 23451
# http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23451
forwarded 301746 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23451
Bug#301746: gcc-3.4: Redundant reloading from stack frame
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
Thanks, doko, for taking the time to respond. Please feel free to
close this bug or tag wontfix if you want so. The more I think about
this, the more this wishlist decreases in priority and I certainly
don't want to take up any of your time with it!
also sprach Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Kraai writes:
What should the severity of the bug reports filed against gcc-4.0 and
family be?
make it important or normal. additional information would be nice, if
lowering the optimization level helps as a workaround, and if it works
with gcc-3.4 and/or gcc-snapshot (the latter is
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:40:04 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#323235: fails to find files during debug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# submitted Debian report #309210 to gcc-gnats as PR 23453
# http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23453
forwarded 309210 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23453
Bug#309210: gcc-4.0 miscompile PARI/GP on x86
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
tags 323313 + unreproducible
thanks
Matt Kraai writes:
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-4
Severity: important
gnubik fails to build because there is an ICE:
if i486-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DWIDGET_SET_gtk=1
-DSCRIPTDIR=\/usr/share/gnubik/scripts\
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 323313 + unreproducible
Bug#323313: ICE compiling gnubik on i386 in size_binop
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# submitted Debian report #321215 to gcc-gnats as PR 23454
# http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23454
forwarded 321215 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23454
Bug#321215: g++-4.0: [sparc] internal compiler error: in invert_exp_1, at
jump.c:1719
Noted your statement that Bug
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:06:13 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#275023: g++-3.4: valgrind reports vectors don't free their
memory
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# submitted Debian report #323325 to gcc-gnats as PR 23456
# http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23456
forwarded 323325 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23456
Bug#323325: ICE compiling gnustep-base's mframe.m
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|objc|middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23456
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-18
11:50 ---
This not really a regression.
This is a dup of bug 8081 which has been a bug since 2.95.3.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 8081 ***
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-18
11:50 ---
*** Bug 23456 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-18
12:01 ---
I think this is just a ra issue which have no hope of being fixed in a release
branch.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-18
12:05 ---
We need at least a testcase which links.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Target Milestone|---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-18
12:17 ---
This is most likely latent on the mainline.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23454
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-4
Severity: important
gcc 4.0.1-4 ICE's when compiling freesci on m68k:
m68k-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../src/include-Wall
-g -O3 -c script.c
../../src/include/gfx_system.h:241: warning: 'gfx_rect_fullscreen' defined but
not used
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 323792 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23458
Bug#323792: ICE when compiling freesci on m68k
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23458.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
forwarded 323792 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23458
thanks
Oops, forgot to attach the test case.
PS: I also submitted the bug upstream.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-18
12:32 ---
Here is the backtrace:
#0 fancy_abort (file=0x5e7648 ../../gcc/jump.c, line=1719, function=0x5e76ec
invert_exp_1) at ../
../gcc/diagnostic.c:556
#1 0x003a72d4 in invert_exp_1 (insn=0x2b8923c) at
A Genuine College Degree in only 2 Weeks
Call for more information:
(717)313-8504
Have you ever thought that the only thing stopping
you from a great job and better pay was a Degree?
Well now that can change.
BA BSc MA MSc MBA PHD
Genuine and Valid
No Study Required
100%
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-18
18:10 ---
Confirmed, a reduced testcase:
void tree_insert();
int empty, nulls;
char found;
long long min_arg, max_arg;
static inline int compare_longlong(const long long s, const long long t) {
return ((s t) ? -1
The latest version of jjtag is available from
http://www.ioware.ca/projects/ejtag/jjtag.tgz
Its written by Brett Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he appears to get
it to compile cleanly.
Regards
AndyP
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 08:23 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
tags 322766 - experimental
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-08-18 21:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=9542)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9542action=view)
testcase, part1 (948 bytes)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23453
---
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-08-18 21:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=9543)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9543action=view)
testcase, part2 (3112 bytes)
These two files are self-contained tescase for this bug, to
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|target |rtl-optimization
Ever Confirmed|
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||mustafa at il dot ibm dot
||com
Summary|[4.0/4.1
gcc-3.3_3.3.6-9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-3.3_3.3.6-9.dsc
gcc-3.3_3.3.6-9.diff.gz
cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.6-9_all.deb
libstdc++5-3.3-doc_3.3.6-9_all.deb
gnat-3.3-doc_3.3.6-9_all.deb
gcc-3.3-doc_3.3.6-9_all.deb
gcc-3.3-base_3.3.6-9_i386.deb
Accepted:
cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.6-9_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.6-9_all.deb
cpp-3.3_3.3.6-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.6-9_i386.deb
g++-3.3_3.3.6-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/g++-3.3_3.3.6-9_i386.deb
gcc-3.3-base_3.3.6-9_i386.deb
to
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
cpp-3.3_3.3.6-9_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
standard.
g++-3.3_3.3.6-9_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
standard.
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-08-19 01:03 ---
Single-file testcase, compile with -march=i486 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
-fno-strict-aliasing -fgcse-after-reload:
bar ()
{
exit (0);
}
baz (x)
{
return x;
}
foo ()
{
abort ();
}
ker0
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
Version|4.0.1 |4.1.0
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-19
04:07 ---
Does this work now?
I thought I saw that it does.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21506
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-19
04:09 ---
Yes it does, this is a dup of bug 21984.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21984 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
42 matches
Mail list logo
