Title: ofertas para este 18 septiembre
SI NO PUEDE VER ESTE CORREO POR FAVOR PRESIONE AQUÍ (
DAR TU DIRECCION DE BAJA DE ESTA PROMOCION )Acatando la nueva Ley
del Consumidor Nº 19.496 y su modificación Nº 19.955 del 2004,en su Artículo
28b, donde regula el envío de correos electrónicos("Tod
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-30 02:46
---
That said, I can't get any test to fail when run by hand. libtool compile
and link line pasted out of the log, as well as the associated LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
What am I missing?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||EH
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23602
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-30 02:09
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot
Hello,
I'm running into some segmentation fault problems with dhcp3-client on
sparc. I'm still trying to research the problem, but I've had someone
contribute a patch that apparently fixes the problem (by routing around
memcpy).
He says it's related to gcc-4.0.1 and memcpy, as the problem doesn't
--- Additional Comments From geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-29
22:21 ---
There was a comment in here about making visibility control happen at the
namespace level.
How would this work with, say, 'vector'? I would expect that if
-fvisibility=hidden is set, then
this instantiat
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-29
20:57 ---
*** Bug 23628 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
I had no compilation problems with g77.
300 format( 1000(a,$))
1
Error: $ must the last specifier in format string at (1)
g77 documentation states:
"A dollar sign at the end of an output format specification suppresses
the newline at the end of the output."
Since thi
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-29 17:28
---
Created an attachment (id=9615)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9615&action=view)
gcc41-pr23567.patch
Patch I have been playing with so far. It tries harder to look for read-only
memory.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
courtesan
Hot Oil Pick Of The Week- ORTE
We have uncovered a diamond here, ORTE is
on the move for strong continued success.
We are recommending it to all of our readers
this week. With experts saying oil can reach
five dollars per gallon by the end of the
year, the oil industry is in strong
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||EH
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23621
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-2
Severity: minor
This ill-formed code makes g++ ICE:
#include
#include
template struct foo;
template<>
struct foo<0>
{
typedef int t;
};
int main()
{
std::cout<< typename foo<0>::t(42);
}
(The typename in the cout line should not be there)
Seems like
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #323686 to gcc-gnats as PR 21123
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21123
> forwarded 323686 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21123
Bug#323686: [arm] ICE compiling orbit2cpp in unstable
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 323792 [PR23458] [m68k] ICE when compiling freesci
Bug#323792: ICE when compiling freesci on m68k
Changed Bug title.
> forwarded 323792 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23458
Bug#323792: [PR23458] [m68k] ICE when compiling freesci
Forwarded-to-address chan
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-29
10:12 ---
Mainline no longer ICEs on the testcase. 3.4.5 shows
pr8081.c:15: internal compiler error: in assign_stack_temp_for_type, at
function.c:658
while 4.0.2 now aborts in
pr8081.c:15: internal compiler error:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #312830 to gcc-gnats as PR 23621
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23621
> forwarded 312830 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23621
Bug#312830: gij-4.0: [m68k] package does not install
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.g
Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:56:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed by a patch for glibc.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #325050 to gcc-gnats as PR 23567
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23567
> forwarded 325050 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23567
Bug#325050: gcc-4.0: [4.0 regression] GCC 4.0 mis-compiles code leading to
segfault
Noted your statement that Bug ha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #324290 to gcc-gnats as PR 19664
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19664
> forwarded 324290 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19664
Bug#324290: g++: undefined reference to `std::basic_ofstream >::basic_ofstream(char const*,
std::_Ios_Openmode)@@GLI
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 321438 [fixed in 4.1] [m68k] ICE when compiling gmp
Bug#321438: [m68k] ICE when compiling gmp
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 323016 [m68k] while compiling tin
Bug#323016: ICE while compiling tin on m68k
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 322532 [m68k]
Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:25:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323417: gcc-4.0: Fails to build 64-bit userspace programs
on ppc: can't find -lgcc_s
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:27:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325183: gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
23 matches
Mail list logo
