Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 324502 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23503
Bug#324502: libgcj6-awt: [GtkImage] assertion failed in compiled code
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23503.
thanks
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-6
Severity: wishlist
It's about time Debian adds gcc-config -like script or make decent
/etc/alternatives for gcc-3.3, gcc-3.4, gcc-4.0. Playing with environment
variables just isn't same!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers
Your message dated Fri, 2 Sep 2005 12:30:28 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326182: gcc-4.0: It's about time Debian adds gcc-config,
or update-alternatives --config gcc alternatives!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Debian Bug Tracking System writes:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 324502 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23503
Bug#324502: libgcj6-awt: [GtkImage] assertion failed in compiled code
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-02
11:30 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
seen on CVS 20050901 for s390-linux as well:
This is really a taget bug, please file a different bug for the s390 issue.
--
What|Removed |Added
Your message dated Fri, 2 Sep 2005 13:40:05 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Appears to be fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
--
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
||patches/2005-
|
--- Additional Comments From wouter at grep dot be 2005-09-02 11:55 ---
Silly me, forgot to include the command line and error message:
gcc -Wall -Wno-unused -g -O3 -fPIC -I /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3-c -o mlgmp_z.o m
lgmp_z.c
In file included from mlgmp_z.c:13:
conversions.c:68:
--- Additional Comments From wouter at grep dot be 2005-09-02 12:17 ---
Lowering the optimization level (to -O2) also makes the build complete.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23674
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the
Hi Matthias,
Il giorno ven, 02/09/2005 alle 12.29 +0200, Matthias Klose ha scritto:
[...]
please note, this is _not_ an upstream bug, the gtk peers in Debian
are updated from CVS. please mention this in the upstream report.
I did not open the upstream bug, but I found it there, so I just added
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-02
13:40 ---
Taking care of the backport to the 3.4 branch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
submitter 320038 !
Bug#320038: [PR 23078] [PR23078][m68k] gcc-4.0: ICE when building faust
Changed Bug submitter from Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Wouter
Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED].
submitter 321415 !
Bug#321415: [PR 23080][m68k] ICE on
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-02 21:39
---
Actually, BACKTRACESPEC does make it into libgcj.spec via substitution.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23602
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-02
21:46 ---
About comment #6 - it doesn't seem to me that this patch could have affected
the setting of BACKTRACESPEC. The most recent change there was on
01-Jun-05; see libjava/configure.host (via cvs annotate) for
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-02 22:08
---
I'm sure that the patches listed in comments #6 and #7 are bogus.
But we've had problems before with unwinding with -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args
(implied by -mtune=i486, implied by i486-linux), plus
15 matches
Mail list logo
