--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-13 09:04
---
At least on i?86, this seems to be introduced by reload, .lreg dump is still
sane.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23837
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
reassign 291921 gcjwebplugin
Bug#291921: gcj: Selfcert website java applet crashes on startup missing class
snifferSimple
Bug reassigned from package `libgcj6' to `gcjwebplugin'.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
forwarded 314704 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314704
Bug#314704: Assertion failure when calling JTabbedPane.addTab(null, ...)
Noted your statement that Bug has been
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
forwarded 314706 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23860
Bug#314706: Exception in JComboBox.removeAllItems()
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
forwarded 314704 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23859
Bug#314704: Assertion failure when calling JTabbedPane.addTab(null, ...)
Forwarded-to-address changed from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 314704 upstream
Bug#314704: Assertion failure when calling JTabbedPane.addTab(null, ...)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 314706 upstream
Bug#314706: Exception in JComboBox.removeAllItems()
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-6
Severity: important
This code gives fails to link unless compiled with optimisation. -O1,
-O2, -O3..., or -Os all compile fine, just -O0 bombs out with:
$ g++-4.0 buggered.cpp
/tmp/cc25MWXo.o: In function `fp::operator(fp const) const':
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:30:49 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#328119: g++-4.0: Fails to build attached code unless
optimisation level 0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
9 matches
Mail list logo