--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-10 04:29
---
Only a hppa-linux bug now, which means this should be targetted at 4.2.0.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Frans Pop wrote:
> Do you mean that the security-flawed kernel patch would not have been
> needed?
Yes. For those interested, the full story is as follows.
gcc-3.3 contained inline functions in the C++ header atomicity.h -- included
by nearly every C++ program, and thus part of the binary inte
> > * or a bug in ld.so -- inability to handle correctly specified multiple
GOTs
> > for more than 16k global symbols
Thiemo wrote:
>
> That (it shouldn't segfault), and/or potentially also a bug in ld which
> leads to failure for large MultiGOT binaries.
Rocking. It looks like most people inv
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-09 17:18
---
Fixing.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|una
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-09 14:02 ---
Confirmed.
The backtrace:
#0 0x001bfaf0 in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr (expr=0x0, label=0x55c1dc
"*.LLCFI0") at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:1461
#1 0x001c0de0 in dwarf2out_frame_debug (insn=0x0, after_p=1 '\001') at
../..
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #324600 to gcc-gnats as PR 24285
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24285
> forwarded 324600 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24285
Bug#324600: gfortran-4.0: format( 1000(a,$))
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/P
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #329840 to gcc-gnats as PR 24284
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24284
> forwarded 329840 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24284
Bug#329840: gcc-4.0: ICE on sparc: error building zinc-compiler
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 330521 + unreproducible
Bug#330521: different results for different parameters order
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
tags 330521 + unreproducible
thanks
Michal =?UTF-8?Q?=C4=8Ciha=C5=99?= writes:
> Package: gcc-4.0
> Version: 4.0.1-9
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi
>
> while compiling with different parameters order you get different
> results:
>
> $ gcc -g -L/usr/X11R6/lib/ -lGL -lglut -lGLU -pthread -Wall configu
Enrico Zini writes:
> Package: gcc-4.0
> Version: 4.0.1-6
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> Many thanks for packaging gcc!
>
> I found a scenario in which code built with libstdc++5 interacts badly
> with code built with libstdc++6, regardless of versioned symbols.
>
> This thread in debian-dev
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20051008-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20051008-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20051008-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20051008-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.deb
gcc-snapshot
gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20051008-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20051008.orig.tar.gz
gcc-snapshot_20051008-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20051008-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
--
jwillemsen at remedy dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwillemsen at remedy dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--
jwillemsen at remedy dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwillemsen at remedy dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
14 matches
Mail list logo
