Bug#343054: gcc-3.3: Invalid x86 assembler code compiling kernel 2.4.27

2005-12-12 Thread Lupe Christoph
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.6-10 Severity: important Compiling the 2.4.27 kernel from the Debian kernel-source-2.4.27 package, version 2.4.27-11: make[2]: Entering directory `/sw/WORK/Debian/Kernel/kernel-source-2.4.27/arch/i386/kernel' gcc-3.3 -D__KERNEL__

trying to build gnat-4.1 under debian ppc

2005-12-12 Thread Xavier Grave
Hi, I will try to compile gnat-4.1 under a powerpc environment. I have debootstraped an unstable debian + experimental sources. I have already succedded in recompiling gnat gpl based on gcc-3.4 (asis, aws and glade seem to run). In the same environment, I will try to recompile gnat-4.1 with the

[Bug java/24441] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE's when building the ecj compiler 3.1.1

2005-12-12 Thread overholt at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 from overholt at redhat dot com 2005-12-12 15:07 --- I am experiencing this now as well. -- overholt at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/24441] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE's when building the ecj compiler 3.1.1

2005-12-12 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 15:58 --- Please try the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00861.html. Let me know if it doesn't work. -- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/24441] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE's when building the ecj compiler 3.1.1

2005-12-12 Thread overholt at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 from overholt at redhat dot com 2005-12-12 16:09 --- (In reply to comment #3) I am experiencing this now as well. I should mention that I'm seeing this on x86_64 but not on i386. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24441 --- You are receiving this

[Bug java/24441] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE's when building the ecj compiler 3.1.1

2005-12-12 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 16:38 --- I just tried it with the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00861.html. Works for me. -- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/24441] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE's when building the ecj compiler 3.1.1

2005-12-12 Thread bero at arklinux dot org
--- Comment #7 from bero at arklinux dot org 2005-12-12 19:05 --- Works for me too (4.1 branch SVN 108424 w/ the referenced patch, x86) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24441 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching

Bug#343108: libstdc++6-4.0-dev: catching exception from codecvt_byname() segfaults

2005-12-12 Thread Marc Herbert
Package: libstdc++6-4.0-dev Version: 4.0.2-5 Severity: normal The following code segfaults. Looks like a double delete, _S_destroy_c_locale() being called twice: first in the regular path of codecvt.h:codecvt_byname ctor, then a second time when ~codecvt() is automatically called to clean up the

[Bug rtl-optimization/23837] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Wrong code with -fschedule-insns

2005-12-12 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:19 --- I can reproduce this on hppa2.0-suse-linux-gnu with the 4.2-20051210 snapshot. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/23837] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Wrong code with -fschedule-insns

2005-12-12 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:28 --- (In reply to comment #15) I can reproduce this on hppa2.0-suse-linux-gnu with the 4.2-20051210 snapshot. Could you make a full set of debugging dumps (i.e. from compiling with -da) available somewhere? --

[Bug rtl-optimization/23837] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Wrong code with -fschedule-insns

2005-12-12 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 21:38 --- Created an attachment (id=10461) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10461action=view) Instruction stream (stripped) before scheduling -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23837

[Bug rtl-optimization/23837] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Wrong code with -fschedule-insns

2005-12-12 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #18 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 21:38 --- Created an attachment (id=10462) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10462action=view) Instruction stream (stripped) after scheduling -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23837 ---

Processing of gcc-4.1_4.1ds4-0exp4_mips.changes

2005-12-12 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.1_4.1ds4-0exp4_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.1-base_4.1-0exp4_mips.deb libgcc1_4.1-0exp4_mips.deb cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_mips.deb protoize_4.1-0exp4_mips.deb fixincludes_4.1-0exp4_mips.deb libmudflap0_4.1-0exp4_mips.deb

[Bug rtl-optimization/23837] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Wrong code with -fschedule-insns

2005-12-12 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #19 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:03 --- The dumps before and after scheduling look OK to me. There are three groups of instructions for libcalls: 1) 19-14-18-20 inputs: regs 95, 99, and 102 (all of them for x) result: reg 97 clobbers: nothing 2)

[Bug rtl-optimization/23837] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Wrong code with -fschedule-insns

2005-12-12 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:14 --- Created an attachment (id=10463) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10463action=view) a full set of debugging dumps Re. comment #16, sorry, I didn't read it until after going through the scheduler

gcc-4.1_4.1ds4-0exp4_mips.changes ACCEPTED

2005-12-12 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_mips.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_mips.deb fastjar_4.1-0exp4_mips.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fastjar_4.1-0exp4_mips.deb fixincludes_4.1-0exp4_mips.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fixincludes_4.1-0exp4_mips.deb g++-4.1_4.1-0exp4_mips.deb to

Processing of gcc-4.1_4.1ds4-0exp4_sparc.changes

2005-12-12 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.1_4.1ds4-0exp4_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.1-base_4.1-0exp4_sparc.deb libgcc1_4.1-0exp4_sparc.deb lib64gcc1_4.1-0exp4_sparc.deb cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_sparc.deb protoize_4.1-0exp4_sparc.deb fixincludes_4.1-0exp4_sparc.deb

gcc-4.1_4.1ds4-0exp4_sparc.changes ACCEPTED

2005-12-12 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_sparc.deb fastjar_4.1-0exp4_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fastjar_4.1-0exp4_sparc.deb fixincludes_4.1-0exp4_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fixincludes_4.1-0exp4_sparc.deb g++-4.1_4.1-0exp4_sparc.deb to

Processing of gcc-4.1_4.1ds4-0exp4_alpha.changes

2005-12-12 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.1_4.1ds4-0exp4_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.1-base_4.1-0exp4_alpha.deb libgcc1_4.1-0exp4_alpha.deb cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_alpha.deb protoize_4.1-0exp4_alpha.deb fixincludes_4.1-0exp4_alpha.deb libmudflap0_4.1-0exp4_alpha.deb

[Bug tree-optimization/18589] could optimize FP multiplies better

2005-12-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 18589 depends on bug 22312, which changed state. Bug 22312 Summary: reassoc does not handle (i+j)+(k+l) well http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22312 What|Old Value |New Value