Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 355439 libgcc1
Bug#355439: gcc-4.0-base: Debian changelog and copyright lost after upgrade
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0-base' to `libgcc1'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
reassign 355439 libgcc1
thanks
Reassigning this to libgcc1, since I found out this package
(and lib64gcc1) at fault (see my previous message).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi
this command , that is in the typescript of the bug, fails
g++ -g -O0 -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -g -O0 -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage
-o .libs/gtkmorph gtksettings.o gdk-pixbuf-extra.o gtk_subimagesel.o
gtktopdata.o main.o callbacks_main.o callbacks_help.o callbacks_img.o
callbacks_edi
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-9
Severity: normal
hi
I wanted to profile my package 'xmorph'; I issued the commands
$ FLAGS='-g -O0 -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage'
$ ./configure CFLAGS="$FLAGS" CXXFLAGS="$FLAGS" LDFLAGS="$FLAGS"
$ make -kCFLAGS="$FLAGS" CXXFLAGS="$FLAGS" LDFLAG
--
michael dot meissner at amd dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael dot meissner at amd
|
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-03-06 17:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/6634
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg00334.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # sorry, I mixed up the bug numbers
> tags 344046 - upstream
Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k
Tags were: upstream wontfix
Tags removed: upstream
> tags 344041 + upstream
Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added:
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 06:20:55PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Both tin and sharutils seem to build now on m68k. Is this fixed?
> Otherwise, is there a test case?
I thought the bug was fixed with the patch that went with the
changelog entry "Proposed patch for #323016 (m68k only). Patch by
Ro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 344041 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR25514
Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR25514.
> tags 344046 + upstream
Bug#344046: FTBFS on m68k
Tags were: wontfix
T
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 03:59:46PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> in #344046, you mention upstream is working on this. Can you give more
> details? Is there a PR? A fix?
pr 25514
So far it's only been noted that it fails with gcc-4.1 and a reduced
testcase has been added.
--
Stephen R. Marenka
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
|
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
|
Matthias Klose wrote:
Sven Joachim writes:
Package: gcc-4.0-base
Version: 4.0.2-10
Severity: serious
It looks as if bug #346171 has raised its ugly head again, since somehow the
files /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0-base{copyright, changelog.Debian.gz} disappeared
after the upgrade from 4.0.2-9 to 4.0.
13 matches
Mail list logo