[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 356548 g++-4.1
If you understand what the problem is here, it would be nice if you
could create a useful test case instead of a 3 lines .ii file that
doesn't even compile on all
* Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-13 09:39]:
reassign 356548 g++-4.1
If you understand what the problem is here, it would be nice if you
could create a useful test case instead of a 3 lines .ii file that
doesn't even compile on all architectures.
I don't understand the
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|3.4.0 4.0.0 4.1.0 |3.4.0 4.0.0
Known to work|3.3.3 |3.3.3
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-13 15:02 ---
This was fixed in 4.0.3 see PR 23797.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23797 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-13 15:02
---
*** Bug 26665 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #90 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-03-13 20:17 ---
with 4.1.1 snapshot + patches I get an arts crash today on my x86_64 box.
Starting program: /usr/bin/artsd
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x2af641d8 in
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-13 09:39]:
reassign 356548 g++-4.1
If you understand what the problem is here, it would be nice if you
could create a useful test case instead of a 3 lines .ii file that
doesn't even compile on all architectures.
clone 356548 -1
reassign -1 par2cmdline
tags 356548 + upstream
forwarded 356548 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26670
thanks
Ben Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I don't understand the problem. Ben (CCed) made a suggestion, but
afaik he hasn't been able yet to come up with a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 356640 java-gcj-compat
Bug#356640: openoffice.org: Fails to Build from Source
Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org' to `java-gcj-compat'.
retitle 355660 undefined symbol: GC_pthread_create
Bug#355660: pstack: incorrect error checking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 356548 -1
Bug#356548: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: on mips: error: cannot bind packed field
Bug 356548 cloned as bug 356767.
reassign -1 par2cmdline
Bug#356767: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: on mips: error: cannot bind packed field
Bug reassigned from package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 355660 pstack: incorrect error checking
Bug#355660: undefined symbol: GC_pthread_create
Changed Bug title.
retitle 356640 undefined symbol: GC_pthread_create
Bug#356640: openoffice.org: Fails to Build from Source
Changed Bug title.
End of
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-13 23:15 ---
Hmm, it does not warn about non-PODs which contain non-PODS which had been
warned about already.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-13 23:47 ---
Subject: Bug 26557
Author: sayle
Date: Mon Mar 13 23:47:47 2006
New Revision: 112032
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112032
Log:
PR middle-end/26557
* stmt.c (emit_case_nodes):
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_3_4_6_release revision 111785
Native configuration is s390-linux-gnu (debian-31)
=== gpc tests ===
Running target any
FAIL: fjf998r.pas
=== gpc Summary ===
# of tests5057
# of expected passes 5053
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_3_4_6_release revision 111785
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Running target unix
WARNING: program timed out.
XPASS: 26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors)
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_0_3_release revision 111908
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_0_3_release revision 111908
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes219
# of unsupported tests 2
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_0_3_release revision 111908
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c36204d
FAIL: c9a009a
FAIL: c9a009c
FAIL: c9a009h
FAIL: c9a010a
FAIL: cb4009a
FAIL: cd5014e
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2313
#
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_0_3_release revision 111908
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cxf3a01
FAIL: cxf3a02
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2318
# of unexpected failures2
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 356231 + upstream
Bug#356231: ICE on 4.1 that doesn't happen with 4.0 (gnubik_2.2-5)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
forwarded 356231 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26672
Bug#356231: ICE on 4.1 that doesn't happen with 4.0 (gnubik_2.2-5)
Noted
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_0_3_release revision 111908
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cc3128a
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2319
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_0_3_release revision 111908
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_0_3_release revision 111908
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-14 00:15 ---
Hmm, The problem is really we are looking at the VOPS pre going into SSA in
set_rhs.
That seems wrong.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-14 01:31 ---
Fix is now on the mainline.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
gcj-4.0_4.0.3-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libgcj6-awt_4.0.3-1_hppa.deb
libgcj6_4.0.3-1_powerpc.deb
gcj-4.0-base_4.0.3-1_hppa.deb
libgcj6-dev_4.0.3-1_i386.deb
libgcj6-awt_4.0.3-1_i386.deb
libgcj6-dev_4.0.3-1_powerpc.deb
Accepted:
gcj-4.0-base_4.0.3-1_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.0/gcj-4.0-base_4.0.3-1_hppa.deb
gcj-4.0-base_4.0.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.0/gcj-4.0-base_4.0.3-1_i386.deb
gcj-4.0-base_4.0.3-1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.0/gcj-4.0-base_4.0.3-1_powerpc.deb
gcj-4.0_4.0.3-1.diff.gz
Matthias Klose wrote:
please recheck (after downgrading to 4.0.2-9), I had two copies of the
packages at different places. Sorry.
I now looked into the new 4.0.3-1 versions, they hopefully fix
this for good. Some people may wonder why the files in
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0-base have two names,
28 matches
Mail list logo
