Re: multiarch -- crucial naming problem with noncanonical system names

We've discovered a critical problem with the multiarch proposal. I don't know where to send this, but it needs to be sent somewhere! (I said): >>Why not just use the canonical system name? Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > No reason. But how do we get that name? > > The existing multiarch prop

Results for 4.1.0 (Debian 4.1.0-0) testsuite on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_1_0_release revision 111560 === acats tests === FAIL: c36204d === acats Summary === # of expected passes2315 # of unexpected failures1 Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu

Results for 3.4.6 (Debian 3.4.6-1) testsuite on sparc-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_3_4_6_release revision 111785 Native configuration is sparc-linux-gnu (thevenin) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: fjf980a.pas FAIL: fjf980b.pas FAIL: fjf998r.pas === gpc Summary === # of tests5

gcc-4.1 override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): gcc-4.1-base_4.1.0-1_alpha.deb: package says section is libs, override says devel. gcc-4.1-base_4.1.0-1_arm.deb: package says section is libs, override says devel. gcc-4.1-base_4.1.0-1_hpp

gcc-4.1_4.1.0-1_multi.changes ACCEPTED

Warning: ignoring gcc-4.1_4.1.0.orig.tar.gz, since it's already in the archive. Accepted: cpp-4.1-doc_4.1.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1-doc_4.1.0-1_all.deb cpp-4.1_4.1.0-1_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.0-1_alpha.deb cpp-4.1_4.1.0-1_arm.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/c

Processing of gcc-4.1_4.1.0-1_multi.changes

gcc-4.1_4.1.0-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libstdc++6_4.1.0-1_sparc.deb libssp0_4.1.0-1_ia64.deb libgfortran1_4.1.0-1_m68k.deb libmudflap0_4.1.0-1_alpha.deb libssp0-dev_4.1.0-1_arm.deb treelang-4.1_4.1.0-1_mips.deb gnat-4.1_4.1.0-1_sparc.deb

Bug#359703: marked as done ([m68k] gcc-4.0_4.0.3-1 ftbfs)

Your message dated Fri, 31 Mar 2006 02:18:54 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#359703: [m68k] gcc-4.0_4.0.3-1 ftbfs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

gcj-4.1_4.1.0-1_multi.changes ACCEPTED

Warning: ignoring gcj-4.1_4.1.0.orig.tar.gz, since it's already in the archive. Accepted: gcj-4.1-base_4.1.0-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gcj-4.1-base_4.1.0-1_hppa.deb gcj-4.1-base_4.1.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gcj-4.1-base_4.1.0-1_i386.deb gcj-4.1-base_4.1.0-1_ia64.deb to poo

Processing of gcj-4.1_4.1.0-1_multi.changes

gcj-4.1_4.1.0-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libgcj7-dbg_4.1.0-1_hppa.deb gcj-4.1-base_4.1.0-1_hppa.deb libgcj7_4.1.0-1_hppa.deb libgcj7-dbg_4.1.0-1_powerpc.deb libgcj7_4.1.0-1_powerpc.deb libgcj7-awt_4.1.0-1_sparc.deb libgcj7_4.1.0-1_i386.deb

Processing of gcc-4.1_4.1.0-1_multi.changes

gcc-4.1_4.1.0-1.diff.gz doesn't exist Due to the errors above, the .changes file couldn't be processed. Please fix the problems for the upload to happen. Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#355439: marked as done (gcc-4.0-base: Debian changelog and copyright lost after upgrade)

Your message dated Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:03:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355439: fixed in gcj-4.1 4.1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#356230: marked as done (ICE instructions tell you to read gcc _4.0_ README)

Your message dated Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:03:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356230: fixed in gcj-4.1 4.1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#349083: marked as done (g++: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c)

Your message dated Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:03:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#349083: fixed in gcj-4.1 4.1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#342557: marked as done (gcj-4.0: Upgrading gcj makes javah disappear)

Your message dated Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:03:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342557: fixed in gcj-4.1 4.1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processing of gcc-4.1_4.1.0-1_multi.changes

gcc-4.1_4.1.0-1.diff.gz has incorrect size; deleting it Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#194513: wanna drop those extra pds for summer

abase allowing the DBA to break up tables into multiple partitions logically at the same at caustic veteran. The story also focuses on the lives of Baumer’s comrades. They http://es.geocities.com/Jake6z454/ is the local to disappear those weight seem to have mentioned my only other companion; h