[Bug java/8923] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE when modifying a variable decleared final static

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||27439 nThis||

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #361602 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR25776 # * remote status changed: NEW - ASSIGNED usertags 361602 -

[Bug libgcj/27294] gij throws NullPointerException, when the interpreter is not enabled

--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-05 15:05 --- Subject: Bug 27294 Author: tromey Date: Fri May 5 15:05:20 2006 New Revision: 113554 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113554 Log: PR libgcj/27294: * java/lang/natVMClassLoader.cc

[Bug libgcj/27294] gij throws NullPointerException, when the interpreter is not enabled

--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-05 15:06 --- Now we print something nicer: opsy. gij t Exception in thread main java.lang.VirtualMachineError: found class file for class t, but no interpreter configured in this libgcj -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org

Results for 4.1.1 20060428 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.0-2) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 28 16:10:47 UTC 2006 (revision 113350) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu === libffi tests === Running target unix XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c execution test XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn1.c execution test XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn2.c

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-3.3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-3.3 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). # remote status report for

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-3.4

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-3.4 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). # remote status report for

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). # remote status report for

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #140201 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21334 # * remote status changed: (?) - NEW forwarded 140201

[bts-link] source package gcj-4.0

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #195344 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1427 # * remote status changed: (?) - NEW forwarded 195344

[bts-link] source package gcc-3.3

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-3.3 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #169862 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1823 # * remote status changed: (?) - RESOLVED # * remote resolution

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #85535 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12086 # * remote status changed: (?) - NEW forwarded 85535

Al-Manahel Newsletter List Unsubscription

The removal of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Date of this removal: Fri May 5 17:57:22 2006 Please save this email message for future reference.

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). # remote status report for

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcj-4.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). # remote status report for

Processed: Re: Bug#365900: priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 365900 -1 Bug#365900: priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1 Bug 365900 cloned as bug 366196. reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug#366196: priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1 Bug reassigned from

Bug#365900: priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1

clone 365900 -1 reassign -1 ftp.debian.org retitle -1 libgnatprj4.1 needs prio optional in the override file severity 365900 important thanks Make libgnatvsn4.1 and libgnatprj4.1 priority optional, changed in svn, needs changes in the override file. Blars Blarson writes: Package: libgnatprj4.1

Bug#366204: gcc-4.0: dangling symlinks

Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.3-1 Severity: minor gcc-4.0 puts three dangling symlinks on my system - is that meant to be the case? /bin/ls: /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/64/libstdc++.so: No such file or directory /bin/ls: /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/64/libgcc_s.so: No such file or