[bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

2006-05-06 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #365123 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27453 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 365123 + status-NEW t

[Bug gcov/profile/27453] gcov opens files with O_RDWR

2006-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 10:43 --- Confirmed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Bug#323186: marked as done (gfortran-4.0: gfortran should warn about 'f95' alias)

2006-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 6 May 2006 12:42:11 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323186: gfortran-4.0: gfortran should warn about 'f95' alias has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#322766: jc1: internal compiler error: segmentation fault

2006-05-06 Thread Matthias Klose
please recheck with 4.1. jjtag 1.2 uses generics, which are not yet supported in gcj-4.1. Matthias Andrew Potter writes: > The latest version of jjtag is available from > http://www.ioware.ca/projects/ejtag/jjtag.tgz > > Its written by Brett Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and he appears to get > i

Bug#350778: marked as done (gcc-4.0: corrupted error messages)

2006-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 6 May 2006 12:19:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line corrupted error messages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#331460: marked as done (gcc-4.0: Some uses of pragma GCC visibility with -fPIC still build position dependent code.)

2006-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 6 May 2006 12:15:20 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Some uses of pragma GCC visibility with -fPIC still build position has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #365123 to gcc-gnats as PR 27453

2006-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #365123 to gcc-gnats as PR 27453 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27453 > forwarded 365123 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27453 Bug#365123: gcc-4.0: gcov opens files with O_RDWR Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.

Bug#347508: marked as done (libstdc++6-4.0-dev: 4.0.3/libstdc++.a BFD: sh_link in section XXX is incorrect)

2006-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 6 May 2006 12:05:54 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libstdc++6-4.0-dev: 4.0.3/libstdc++.a BFD: sh_link in section XXX is incorrect has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Re: resetting forwarded addresses (Re: Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-3.4)

2006-05-06 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le Sam 6 Mai 2006 02:18, Matthias Klose a écrit : > Please STOP resetting the forwarded address I do not reset, I follow duplicates, which is a most wanted feature > and revert the changes you already did. I never do such a thing. sometimes it looks like so, but it's because atm, I generate co

Bug#358761: libmudflapth doesn't report simple bounds violations, libmudflap does.

2006-05-06 Thread Matthias Klose
Maybe http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26864 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#364907: libstdc++6: application crash on throwing/catching exceptions

2006-05-06 Thread Matthias Klose
Please could you recheck using gcc-4.1 / g++-4.1 as the compiler to build your application? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#360504: libmudflap0-dev: Broken symlink in /usr/lib64

2006-05-06 Thread Matthias Klose
Dylan Thurston writes: > Package: libmudflap0-dev > Version: 4.1.0-1 > Severity: minor > > This package contains a link > > /usr/lib64/libmudflap.so -> libmudflap.so.0.0.0 > > This second file is not provided by any file. Why are there files > being created in /usr/lib64 on a i386 architecture

Bug#366094: libssp0-dev: No documentation

2006-05-06 Thread Matthias Klose
Ted Percival writes: > Package: libssp0-dev > Version: 4.1.0-2 > Severity: normal > > Neither libssp0-dev or libssp0 contain any documentation on how to use > them! some links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack-smashing_protection http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/gnu-stack.xml http:/

Bug#365780: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on amd64, sparc with "configure.in:2177: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_FOR_TARGET"

2006-05-06 Thread Matthias Klose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Package: gcc-4.1 > Version: 4.1.0-2 > Severity: serious > > The patch ada-link-lib.dpatch changes the top-level configure.in, then > calls autoconf to regenerate configure. Autoconf then bails out with: > > configure.in:2177: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_FOR_TA