--- Comment #5 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-05-17 12:49 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Actually the orginal testcase here was not fixed by the patch which is going
to
fix PR 26626 either.
So reopening.
Daniel, since you fixed 26626, do you think you could take a look at this one
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20060508-1
I forwarded this as PR27640.
Automatic build of sfs_1:0.8-0+pre20060514.1-1 on
test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by sbuild/powerpc 0.44
...
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/build/tbm/sfs-0.8-0+pre20060514.1/./sfsrwcd -I..
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 367652 + upstream
Bug#367652: segfault, related to constructor instantiation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
forwarded 367652 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27640
Bug#367652: segfault, related to constructor instantiation
Noted your statement
Package: gcc
Version: 4:4.0.2-2
Summary:
GCC should be more tolerant of
gcc -Wno-this-is-not-a-recognised-warning
as specified in detail below.
Discussion:
Occasionally, GCC introduces new warnings. For example, GCC 4 has
introduced warnings about discrepancies in signedness of integers
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 152473 + sid
Bug#152473: toolame: creates stereo only
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
tag 152791 + sid
Bug#152791: miscfiles: typos in constitution
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
tag 162663 + sid
Bug#162663: libc0.3-dev: depends
Package: gfortran-4.1
Version: 4.1.0-4
Severity: normal
gfortran-4.1 is currently uninstallable on Sid. The exact errors I am getting
are
$wajig install gfortran-4.1
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 16:45
---
*** Bug 27085 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 16:45 ---
Both of the testcases here were fixed by the patch for PR 27373.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 27373 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
X-send-pr-version: 3.113
X-GNATS-Notify:
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Thomas Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:05:17 +0200
Submitter-Id: net
Originator:Thomas Richter
Organization:
Confidential: no
Synopsis: ICE on attribute cast
Severity: serious
--- Comment #24 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 20:38
---
Removing the 4.1 marker, as this is now fixed on the 4.1 branch.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
The removal of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set.
Date of this removal: Wed May 17 16:10:52 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
Package: gcc-2.95
Version: 1:2.95.4-24
Severity: normal
The file is_pair.c below compiled with
gcc-2.95 -O2 -S is_pair.c
results in the following in is_pair.s
movl (%ebx),%edx
testb $6,%bl
jne .L10
which I believe is incorrect for the input.
Those insns are
Package:gcc-4.0
Version:4.0.3-3
Serverity:wishlist
The following patch files have a same path to create
gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/switch-1.c.
debian/patches/pr-26557.dpatch
debian/patches/svn-updates.dpath
I think pr-26557.dpatch will not be needed.
Regards,
Kazuhiro Inaoka
--
13 matches
Mail list logo