Hey buddy,
Are you stuck in a job that is leading you on the path to no where?
Do you wish you could better your financial situtation?
We can help you obtain a College Degree with classes, books, and exams
from a reputable Univ, transcripts included.
Call me anytime at 1 - 206 - 350 - 3737
Justin Pryzby wrote:
reassign 352493 java-gcj-compat-dev
retitle 352493 rmic.1.gz is a dangling symlink
thanks
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 10:02:56PM +0100, Greg Kochanski wrote:
Justin Pryzby wrote:
man-db: Dangling symlink
http://bugs.debian.org/352493
Hello Greg,
Did you ever get around to
unreproducible. does /usr/share/info/dir exist? If yes, pleae recheck
with debian-only apt resources.
Jan Staniek writes:
Package: fastjar
Version: 1:4.1.0-4
Hello,
when I upgraded some days ago my system (debian-testing) apt-get reported an
error while installing the package fastjar.
Ludovic Brenta writes:
+Java:
+fastjar Jar creation utility
the package names are missing (although built from gcj-4.1); biarch
packages are missing as well.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Kazuhiro Inaoka writes:
Package:gcc-4.1
Version:4.1.0-4
Severity:wishlist
Please disable Ada for m32r in debian/rules.defs.
please attach a patch; I assume this some embedded target. All other
languages should be built?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2006 00:21:30 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#367674: gfortran-4.1: uninstallable on Sid due to
dependency problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Jonas Meyer writes:
Package: gcc-4.1-source
Severity: normal
cross-configure.dpatch doesn't apply when following the instructions in
README.cross.
Indeed building according to README.cross doesn't work, because those
patches don't apply. However, when simply skipping them, the build
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2006 00:53:59 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#368477: gcc-4.0 should NOT depend on libc6-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2006 01:21:25 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#353732: libg2c0-dev: unable to compile 64bit binary with
g77-3.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On 5/26/06, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
works for me; please make sure that your mirror is up to date, elsetry to find out why it's uninstallable. dselect might help to findthat out.There is some problem which I am not able to pin point. I am using uptodate mirrors. I tried using
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2006 01:50:24 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line please configure gcc-3.4 on i386 with --with-arch=i486
--with-tune=i686
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Nikita, still interested in fixing that for 3.4, or should we close
that as wontfix?
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2006 02:05:36 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line g++-3.4 -O1: wrong code generation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 347817 + wontfix
Bug#347817: please configure gcc-3.4/gcc-4.0 on i386 with --with-arch=i486
--with-tune=i686
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2006 01:53:16 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line libstdc++6-0 missing symlink to libstdc++.so.6 (ARM)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
15 matches
Mail list logo