Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
# remote status report
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #366939
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27571
# * remote status changed: NEW - RESOLVED
# * remote
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #356569
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26757
# * remote status changed: NEW - REOPENED
usertags 356569 -
Nikita, still interested in fixing that for 3.4, or should we close
that as wontfix?
It's not very likely that activity on cross stuff will be restored soon :(.
However, some time ago, Wartan Hachaturov [EMAIL PROTECTED] agreed to take
the cross compiler packaging work. So I am readdressing
Jonas Meyer writes:
Package: gcc-4.1-source
Severity: normal
cross-configure.dpatch doesn't apply when following the instructions in
README.cross.
Indeed building according to README.cross doesn't work, because those
patches don't apply. However, when simply skipping them, the
Nikita V. Youshchenko writes:
Nikita, still interested in fixing that for 3.4, or should we close
that as wontfix?
It's not very likely that activity on cross stuff will be restored soon :(.
However, some time ago, Wartan Hachaturov [EMAIL PROTECTED] agreed to take
the cross compiler
Hi,
Why -m64 enabled by default for x86? This is debian sid.
Both debian gcc3 and gcc4 have -m64 enabled.
Thanks!
--
Coywolf Qi Hunt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7 matches
Mail list logo