Matthias Klose wrote:
Kazuhiro Inaoka writes:
Package:gcc-4.1
Version:4.1.0-4
Severity:wishlist
Please disable Ada for m32r in debian/rules.defs.
please attach a patch; I assume this some embedded target. All other
languages should be built?
Yes. I propose to disable Ada only.
Thanks,
ka
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #367856
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27657
# * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED -> NEW
usertags 367856 -
Wartan Hachaturow writes:
> On 5/29/06, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Maybe better to set up BTS pseudo-package for cross-toolchain related
> > problems, with all mail forwarded to debian-embedded@, and reassign all
> > related bugs there?
>
> I second this -- it would be
> Wartan Hachaturow writes:
> > On 5/29/06, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Maybe better to set up BTS pseudo-package for cross-toolchain
> > > related problems, with all mail forwarded to debian-embedded@, and
> > > reassign all related bugs there?
> >
> > I second this --
On 5/29/06, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe better to set up BTS pseudo-package for cross-toolchain related
problems, with all mail forwarded to debian-embedded@, and reassign all
related bugs there?
I second this -- it would be much easier for us to manage then.
Regardi
> Nikita V. Youshchenko writes:
> > > Nikita, still interested in fixing that for 3.4, or should we close
> > > that as wontfix?
> >
> > It's not very likely that activity on cross stuff will be restored
> > soon :(. However, some time ago, Wartan Hachaturov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > agreed to take
6 matches
Mail list logo
