Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20060530-1
Severity: important
gcc 4.2 no longer builds on Alpha since an ICE occurs when building
classpath. This is PR27858.
if /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile
/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20060530/build/./gcc/xgcc
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.3-3
This ICE occurs with gcc 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, but not with 3.4. PR27861
Automatic build of gdb_6.4-1 on swarm by sbuild/mipsel 0.45
...
cc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPROFILE=1 -DWITH_PROFILE=-1
-DWITH_ALIGNMENT=NONSTRICT_ALIGNMENT -DWITH_TARGET_WORD_BITSIZE=32
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 365934
Bug#365934: java-gcj-compat-dev: Dead links in /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/include/
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
stop
reopen 365934
stop
If you choose to resolve this by tightening the dependency on gcj, then the
dependency needs to look something like
gcj-4.1 (= 4.1.1), gcj-4.1 ( 4.1.2)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Eisentraut writes:
reopen 365934
stop
If you choose to resolve this by tightening the dependency on gcj, then the
dependency needs to look something like
gcj-4.1 (= 4.1.1), gcj-4.1 ( 4.1.2)
wrong. the latter version is unknown.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
tags 365934 +etch
merge 365934 367038
thanks
Peter Eisentraut writes:
Am Donnerstag, 1. Juni 2006 16:58 schrieb Matthias Klose:
Peter Eisentraut writes:
reopen 365934
stop
If you choose to resolve this by tightening the dependency on gcj, then
the dependency needs to look
Am Donnerstag, 1. Juni 2006 16:58 schrieb Matthias Klose:
Peter Eisentraut writes:
reopen 365934
stop
If you choose to resolve this by tightening the dependency on gcj, then
the dependency needs to look something like
gcj-4.1 (= 4.1.1), gcj-4.1 ( 4.1.2)
wrong. the latter version
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 365934 +etch
Bug#365934: java-gcj-compat-dev: Dead links in /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/include/
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch
merge 365934 367038
Bug#365934: java-gcj-compat-dev: Dead links in /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/include/
Bug#367038:
Peter Eisentraut writes:
Am Donnerstag, 1. Juni 2006 16:58 schrieb Matthias Klose:
Peter Eisentraut writes:
reopen 365934
stop
If you choose to resolve this by tightening the dependency on gcj, then
the dependency needs to look something like
gcj-4.1 (= 4.1.1), gcj-4.1 (
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 369817 + upstream
Bug#369817: [4.0,4.1,4.2 regression][mips] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at
expr.c:6864
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
forwarded 369817 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27861
Bug#369817: [4.0,4.1,4.2 regression][mips] ICE in
I have several questions for those of you seeing this problem, to try
and get to the root cause. I don't use amcheck in cron myself, so could
use your help chasing down the problem.
First, have any of you tried the 2.5.0p2-1 amanda-server package yet? I
don't see anything in the upstream
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #369817
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27861
# * remote status changed: (?) - UNCONFIRMED
usertags 369817 +
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #369810
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27858
# * remote status changed: (?) - NEW
usertags 369810 +
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
# remote status report
Package: gcj-4.1
Version: 4.1.0-2j1
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
GCJ fails with
Can't find default package 'core'. ...
when a class source file specifies `import core.*'. A full example is
outlined below.
Suppose we have the directory structure
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:17:47 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361608: fixed in ecj-bootstrap 3.1.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:17:47 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#361806: fixed in ecj-bootstrap 3.1.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
17 matches
Mail list logo
