--- Comment #8 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-05 06:18 ---
Agreed, let's close it.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONF
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 04:47:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Falk Hueffner writes:
> > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Hi Matthias,
> > >> works for me.
> > > Have you tried building it with prctl --unaligned=signal? This is not
> > > the default on hppa, but it's used on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 322766 + fixed
Bug#322766: jc1: internal compiler error: segmentation fault
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 19:47
---
I propose we close this PR. The 4.0 series is what it is, and, as I understand
it, the libstdc++ ABI for this allocator isn't guaranteed and Debian has
changed its defaults, so it doesn't seem particularly useful
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26866
--- You a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 366820 gcc-defaults
Bug#366820: Transition to GCC 4.1 for etch
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `gcc-defaults'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
severity 370308 important
tags 370308 + pending
thanks
not yet the default compiler.
Martin Michlmayr writes:
> Source: gcc-4.1
> Version: 4.1.1-1
> Severity: grave
>
> After 4.1.1 was released, an error check was fixed in SVN that, as a
> side effect, rejects valid code. This breaks lots of pa
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--
lopezibanez at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lopezibanez at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 370308 important
Bug#370308: bogus gcc error check breaks perl headers
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 370308 + pending
Bug#370308: bogus gcc error check breaks perl headers
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
--
lopezibanez at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lopezibanez at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
reassign 370341 cvs
thanks
* Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-04 18:57]:
> Package: gcc
uhm... :)
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 370341 cvs
Bug#370341: CVS fails to update some repositories
Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `cvs'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #370248
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27891
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 370248 + status-NEW
t
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #364591
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27273
# * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED
# * remote reso
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26559
--- You a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status rep
Package: gcc
Version: 1.12.13-2
Severity: important
The current cvs client in unstable fails to update a (non-anonymous)
binutils checkout:
hattusa:~/binutils/cvs-write$ cvs up
? bfd/doc/bfd.info
? binutils/doc/binutils.info
? gas/doc/as.info
? ld/ld.info
Write failed flushing stdout buffer.
writ
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:47
---
m68k is not a primary or secondary platform.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Package: gcc-4.1
Severity: important
Version: 4.1.1-1
Tags: patch
Hello,
thanks for enabling java on kFreeBSD.
Unfortunately, the kbsd-gnu-java.dpatch somehow got DOS (CRLF) end of lines.
Please, could you filter it through "fromdos" or "tr -d \\r"
and preferably also verify result via "od -ax"
Source: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-1
Severity: grave
After 4.1.1 was released, an error check was fixed in SVN that, as a
side effect, rejects valid code. This breaks lots of packages since
the "error" is in a Perl header. Please revert the patch from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2606
Your message dated Sun, 04 Jun 2006 07:53:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367999: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 04 Jun 2006 07:53:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367166: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 04 Jun 2006 07:53:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367595: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 04 Jun 2006 07:53:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369690: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Accepted:
cpp-4.1-doc_4.1.1-1_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1-doc_4.1.1-1_all.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-1_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.1-1_hppa.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.1-1_i386.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-
Falk Hueffner writes:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> >> works for me.
> >
> > Have you tried building it with prctl --unaligned=signal? This is not
> > the default on hppa, but it's used on the autobuilders because it
> > catches potentially costly programmi
Please coordinate with Thiemo, he planned an upload this weekend.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:03:40PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > please send a fix. I do not intend to touch this code. it's fixed in
> > the 3.4, 4.0 and 4.1 packages.
>
> Hello Matthias,
>
> Daniel
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:03:40PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> please send a fix. I do not intend to touch this code. it's fixed in
> the 3.4, 4.0 and 4.1 packages.
Hello Matthias,
Daniel and Matt Krai provided a patch for this bug.
Do you plan to upload this package soon ?
In the alternative
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 370248 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27891
Bug#370248: [alpha] ICE in tree_split_edge, at tree-cfg.c:3107
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27891.
> tags 370248 + upstream
Bug#370248: [alpha] ICE in tree_split_ed
forwarded 370248 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27891
tags 370248 + upstream
retitle 370248 [4.0/4.1 regression][alpha] ICE in tree_split_edge, at
tree-cfg.c:3107
thanks
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-04 12:42]:
> ICE on Alpha, doesn't happen with gcc 4.0 or 4.2. I'm running delta
> now..
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.0-4
ICE on Alpha, doesn't happen with gcc 4.0 or 4.2. I'm running delta
now...
> Automatic build of qdbm_1.8.51-1 on hulk by sbuild/alpha 0.45
...
> alpha-linux-gnu-g++ -I. -I./.. -I/build/tbm/include -I/usr/local/include
> -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED=1 -D_GNU_SOURCE=
Hello,
despite having the latest of libstdc++6, the problem is still not
solved for me:
# apt-get update
...
Reading package lists... Done
# /usr/bin/apt-get -f install libstdc++6
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
libstdc++6 is already the newest version.
0 upgrade
33 matches
Mail list logo
