--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
Package: g++-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-5
Severity: important
While linking code that uses boost date_time headers, I get lots of
errors like:
foo.o: (.data+0x0): multiple definition of
`_ZN5boost9date_time18parse_match_resultIT_E11PARSE_ERRORE'
bar.o:(.data+0x0): first defined here
That's from
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.3-3
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer,
The following code generates the g++ compiler error:
14: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion
before Outer
template typename T
class Outer
{
public:
Package: libstdc++6
Version: 4.1.1-5
Severity: important
The attached source file (UTF-8 encoded) demonstrates that codecvt
is broken for the simplest of transformations (UTF-8 to UCS-4).
This is pretty basic, and the underlying gconf stuff works correctly,
so the bug is either in libstdc++6 or
gcj-4.1_4.1.1-5_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcj-4.1_4.1.1-5_hppa.deb
libgcj7-dev_4.1.1-5_hppa.deb
libgcj7-awt_4.1.1-5_i386.deb
libgcj-doc_4.1.1-5_all.deb
libgcj7-jar_4.1.1-5_all.deb
libgcj-common_4.1.1-5_all.deb
libgcj7_4.1.1-5_i386.deb
Accepted:
gcj-4.1-base_4.1.1-5_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gcj-4.1-base_4.1.1-5_hppa.deb
gcj-4.1-base_4.1.1-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gcj-4.1-base_4.1.1-5_i386.deb
gcj-4.1-base_4.1.1-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gcj-4.1-base_4.1.1-5_powerpc.deb
gcj-4.1_4.1.1-5.diff.gz
Reported upstream as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28059
Note this affects GCC versions 3.3, 4.0, 4.1 and 4.2. It works
correctly in 3.4.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux
forwarded 373895 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28016
tags 373895 + upstream
retitle 373895 [PR28016] g++-4.1: multiple definition linker errors with code
that used to work
thanks
* Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-16 00:31]:
While linking code that uses boost date_time headers, I get lots of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 373895 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28016
Bug#373895: g++-4.1: multiple definition linker errors with code that used to
work
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28016.
tags 373895 + upstream
Bug#373895: g++-4.1:
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
|
* IOhannes m zmoelnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-11 15:16]:
furthermore i am using nvidia's non-free openGL implementation, so i
guess this is related to their drivers... :-( probably they just need to
get recompiled with gcc-4.1
Can you confirm that this solved the issue?
--
Martin
forwarded 373937 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28059
tags 373937 + upstream
thanks
* Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-16 14:14]:
Reported upstream as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28059
Thanks a lot for that.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
[ forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/373820 ]
We're seeing the following ICE, both with gcc 4.1 and latest 4.2 (but 4.0
works). Apparently it only happens on x86_64. It works when you drop the
optimization flag.
(sid)75:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/delta/bin] /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -c -O2
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail||4.1.1 4.2.0
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-16 15:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=11681)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11681action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28062
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
* Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-28 14:22]:
I came across a strange bug which I'm utterly unable to reproduce on
anything but Debian unstable (including testing on Fedora Core 5).
Basically, I've worked out (through using valgrind and gdb) that calling
ifstream::read() causes a crash
forwarded 373820 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28062
tags 373820 + upstream
thanks
* Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-15 20:08]:
cynthiune.app is failing to build on amd64 with the following error:
Building it with -O0 or -Os works, -O1 or higher doesn't work.
Using gcc-4.0 (gobjc-4.0) version
* Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-25 10:09]:
Seen on two machines, the make -k check just terminates with Killed.
dmesg shows:
pass37-frag.exe(12520): unaligned trap at 000120026820: 00012aac
29 1
Falk, can you look at this one?
--
Martin Michlmayr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 372778 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27884
Bug#372778: [PR27884] invalid use of 'register' in linkage specification
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27884.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 373937 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28059
Bug#373937: libstdc++6: codecvt locale facet is broken
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28059.
tags 373937 + upstream
Bug#373937: libstdc++6: codecvt locale facet is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 373820 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28062
Bug#373820: gcc-4.1: ICE on amd64 building cynthiune.app.
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28062.
tags 373820 + upstream
Bug#373820: gcc-4.1: ICE on amd64 building
* Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-19 14:38]:
not reproducible with g++-4.1:
$ LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 ./a.out | od -c
000 c o u t n o l o c a l e :
020 1 0 2 4 \n c o u t w i t h
040 l o c a l
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
I have attached two additional testcases to the upstream bug report.
The testcases are now:
Testcase to show codecvt crash
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11679 (wide.cc)
Use mbsnrtowcs directly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11682 (wide2.cc)
C example using
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.1.2 4.2.0
Summary|[4.2 Regression] emitting |[4.1/4.2
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-16 18:46
---
Subject: Bug 27884
Author: mmitchel
Date: Fri Jun 16 18:45:50 2006
New Revision: 114727
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114727
Log:
PR c++/27884
* decl.c (have_extern_spec):
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-16 18:53
---
Fixed in 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-16 19:01 ---
No, this is different problem than you think it is. The problem is we are
emitting a constant that does not make sense at all.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28016 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-16 19:01 ---
*** Bug 28065 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||28067
nThis||
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||28067
nThis||
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #353366
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26559
# * remote status changed: ASSIGNED - NEW
usertags 353366 -
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #367652
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27640
# * remote status changed: NEW - RESOLVED
# * remote
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #372778
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27884
# * remote status changed: (?) - ASSIGNED
usertags 372778 +
Hib,
Hope I am not writing to wrong addresbs. I am nice, pretty looking
girl. I am planning on visitibng yaour town this month. Can
we meet each other in person? Message me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
# remote status report
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-16 23:09
---
Subject: Bug 27884
Author: mmitchel
Date: Fri Jun 16 23:09:23 2006
New Revision: 114731
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114731
Log:
PR c++/27884
* decl.c (have_extern_spec):
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-16 23:09
---
Fixed in 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jun 13 23:42:42 UTC 2006 (revision 114624)
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes228
# of unsupported tests 2
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jun 13 23:42:42 UTC 2006 (revision 114624)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c36204d
FAIL: cd5014e
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2315
# of unexpected failures2
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jun 13 23:42:42 UTC 2006 (revision 114624)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c96005d
FAIL: cc3120a
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes1959
# of unexpected failures2
# of unsupported tests 356
Native configuration
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jun 13 23:42:42 UTC 2006 (revision 114624)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c96005d
FAIL: cc3120a
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes1959
# of unexpected failures2
# of unsupported tests 356
Native configuration
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jun 13 23:42:42 UTC 2006 (revision 114624)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c37211b
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2316
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jun 13 23:42:42 UTC 2006 (revision 114624)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2317
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: trunk revision 114610
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/complit1.C (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/complit1.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: trunk revision 114610
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/complit1.C (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/complit1.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: trunk revision 114610
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/other/unused1.C scan-assembler stringz?\\tclass2
FAIL: g++.dg/other/unused1.C scan-assembler stringz?\\tprinter
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jun 13 23:42:42 UTC 2006 (revision 114624)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2317
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||28067
nThis||
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 01:11
---
Subject: Bug 28016
Author: mmitchel
Date: Sat Jun 17 01:11:34 2006
New Revision: 114739
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114739
Log:
PR c++/28016
* decl.c (cp_finsh_decl): Do
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 01:14
---
Fixed in 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||28067
nThis||
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 01:35 ---
This worked with 4.2.0 20060507.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28062
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 01:50 ---
It works in 4.2.0 for sure. It does fail in 4.1.2 20060608 though.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 02:07 ---
The backtrace:
#0 fancy_abort (file=0xa6b580
/home/pinskia/src/gcc-4.1/gcc/gcc/simplify-rtx.c, line=3807,
function=0xa6c3f0 simplify_subreg)
at /home/pinskia/src/gcc-4.1/gcc/gcc/diagnostic.c:602
#1
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 02:21 ---
Here is a C testcase (so that it does not get marked as P5):
typedef struct _NSPoint NSPoint;
struct _NSPoint
{
float x;
float y;
};
static inline NSPoint
NSMakePoint (float x, float y)
{
NSPoint point;
57 matches
Mail list logo
