Bug#376797: #376797 - additional information

2006-07-05 Thread Bryan Donlan
By forcing gij to continue by exporting MALLOC_CHECK_=1, I get: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x080c1050 *** (.:17337): Pango-WARNING **: pango_ft2_font_get_face called with bad font, expect ugly output malloc: using debugging hooks java.lang.InternalError: Pango:

[Bug c++/4882] fails to lookup a template specialization dependent of an outer template

2006-07-05 Thread fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
-- fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot |

Bug#128950: [Bug c/9072] -Wconversion should be split into two distinct flags

2006-07-05 Thread lopezibanez at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-07-05 11:15 --- Created an attachment (id=11826) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11826action=view) split current functionality of Wconversion in two different options This patch divides the functionality of

Bug#128950: [Bug c/9072] -Wconversion should be split into two distinct flags

2006-07-05 Thread lopezibanez at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-07-05 11:22 --- Created an attachment (id=11828) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11828action=view) detect implicit conversions where a value may change patch 3of3 http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Wcoercion#Background

Bug#128950: [Bug c/9072] -Wconversion should be split into two distinct flags

2006-07-05 Thread lopezibanez at gmail dot com
--- Comment #15 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-07-05 11:18 --- Created an attachment (id=11827) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11827action=view) Adds a new function which detects when a real value can be exactly represented as an integer. Patch 2of3

[Bug c/6614] [-Wconversion] incorrect conversion warning for function taking a short

2006-07-05 Thread lopezibanez at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-07-05 11:34 --- I think we may close this bug report since either: * The solution is to split the functionality of Wconversion as conceived by the Wcoercion project http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Wcoercion#Background. In that case, this is

[Bug c/6614] [-Wconversion] incorrect conversion warning for function taking a short

2006-07-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-05 11:37 --- See comment #1, this is how it is intended. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Welcome to Al-Manahel Newsletter List

2006-07-05 Thread munir
The subscription of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Thanks for subscribing! Date of this subscription: Wed Jul 5 06:05:35 2006 Please save this email message for future reference.

gcc-4.1_4.1.1-7_alpha.changes ACCEPTED

2006-07-05 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-4.1_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb fastjar_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fastjar_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb fixincludes_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fixincludes_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb g++-4.1_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb to

[Bug rtl-optimization/28221] [4.1 regression] ICE in add_insn_before, at emit-rtl.c:3479

2006-07-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-05 13:36 --- With checking enabled we have obj2/gcc ./cc1plus -quiet -O2 t.ii t.ii: In static member function 'static IntType boost::random::const_modIntType, m::mult_schrage(IntType, IntType) [with IntType = int, IntType m =

Bug#376871: Wrong template constant as symbol (PR28016).

2006-07-05 Thread David Martínez Moreno
Package: g++-4.1 Severity: normal Hello, GCC maintainers. When compiling k3d package, in some part I have the following error: .libs/user_interface.o:(.data+0x0): multiple definition of `_ZN5boost9date_time18parse_match_resultIT_E11PARSE_ERRORE' .libs/black_box_recorder.o:(.data+0x0):

Processing of gcc-4.1_4.1.1-7_alpha.changes

2006-07-05 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.1_4.1.1-7_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.1-base_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb libgcc1_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb cpp-4.1_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb protoize_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb fixincludes_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb libmudflap0_4.1.1-7_alpha.deb

Processed: Re: Bug#376616: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: warning: statement with no effect

2006-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 376616 -1 Bug#376616: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: warning: statement with no effect Bug 376616 cloned as bug 376895. reassign 376616 gcc-snapshot 20060626-1 Bug#376616: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: warning: statement with no effect Bug reassigned from package

Bug#376901: gcc4 (*p)+=(*p=6) bug

2006-07-05 Thread NyOS
Package: gcc Version: 4:4.0.3-4 gcc -v gcc version 4.0.4 20060507 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.3-3) Hi! I use testing version of debian with gcc4, and it compiles the following c code wrong way: #include stdio.h int a=13; int t[1]={13}; int b=13; int *p; int main() { p=b; printf(a:%d

Bug#376901: marked as done (gcc4 (*p)+=(*p=6) bug)

2006-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 05 Jul 2006 19:40:23 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#376901: gcc4 (*p)+=(*p=6) bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#188943: [Bug c++/10891] code using dynamic_cast causes segfaults when -fno-rtti is used

2006-07-05 Thread apl at alum dot mit dot edu
--- Comment #7 from apl at alum dot mit dot edu 2006-07-05 18:50 --- I think that this fix may have been too aggressive. I have a templated class with a member function that does a dynamic_cast. With 4.2, I'm getting errors when I compile this template, despite the fact that I don't

Bug#188943: [Bug c++/10891] code using dynamic_cast causes segfaults when -fno-rtti is used

2006-07-05 Thread apl at alum dot mit dot edu
-- apl at alum dot mit dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||28275 nThis||

Bug#188943: [Bug c++/10891] code using dynamic_cast causes segfaults when -fno-rtti is used

2006-07-05 Thread apl at alum dot mit dot edu
--- Comment #8 from apl at alum dot mit dot edu 2006-07-05 19:08 --- Created an attachment (id=11835) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11835action=view) protection against dynamic_cast with -fno-rtti is too eager Here's a test that NEVER instantiates the template, but

[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs

2006-07-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-05 20:38 --- This is intended behavior: a non-POD type which has been marked as packed can be used as a packed field. 13983 and 17519 are bugs in that feature. In this case, nonpod_pack::n is not packed, so it is safe to pack

Bug#376213: marked as done ([amd64] : compiler produces wrong code for )

2006-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 5 Jul 2006 23:45:48 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#376213: [amd64] : compiler produces wrong code for has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#376901: gcc4 (*p)+=(*p=6) bug

2006-07-05 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 06:20:27PM +0200, NyOS wrote: printf(a:%d t[0]:%d *p:%d\n,a,t[0],*p); a+=(a=2)+(a=3); Modifies one value multiple times without sequence point: Undefined behaviour. t[0]+=(t[0]=2)+(t[0]=3); Modifies one value multiple times without sequence point: Undefined

gcc-defaults_1.37_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-07-05 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-doc_4.1.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp-doc_4.1.1-2_i386.deb cpp_4.1.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.1.1-2_i386.deb g++_4.1.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4.1.1-2_i386.deb g77-doc_3.4.6-6_i386.deb to

gcc-defaults override disparity

2006-07-05 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): gnat-doc_4.1.1-2_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says doc. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package

Processing of gcc-defaults_1.37_i386.changes

2006-07-05 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-defaults_1.37_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-defaults_1.37.dsc gcc-defaults_1.37.tar.gz cpp_4.1.1-2_i386.deb cpp-doc_4.1.1-2_i386.deb gcc_4.1.1-2_i386.deb gcc-doc_4.1.1-2_i386.deb gnat_4.1.1-2_i386.deb gnat-doc_4.1.1-2_i386.deb

[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs

2006-07-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 26670 depends on bug 13983, which changed state. Bug 13983 Summary: no warning on some non-POD struct with packed attribute http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13983 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs

2006-07-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 26670 depends on bug 17519, which changed state. Bug 17519 Summary: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Warning for array of packed non-POD in packed struct http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17519 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs

2006-07-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 03:48 --- Hmm, actually comment #2 does seem like a bug, both foos should compile cleanly. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs

2006-07-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org