Your message dated Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:39:25 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line problem went away
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-19 11:40
---
Here's a slightly shorter testcase:
=
struct A
{
char c[13];
int k[1];
};
struct A a[1];
void foo(int* p)
{
int i, j;
for (i=0; i2; ++i)
if (memcmp (a[i].k,
The removal of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set.
Date of this removal: Wed Jul 19 06:34:41 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
The original message was received at Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:58:16 +0500
from 2.187.217.128
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-19 15:45 ---
B violates ODR rules as the class for A is different between the TUs as it is
in an anon namespace.
See PR 28360 for full details.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28360 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mueller at gcc dot gnu dot
|
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So you're saying the only way is to compile, link, and test each of the
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-19 17:38
---
This test case now works for me on both the 4.1 and 4.2 branches.
Martin, would you please confirm that, at your convenience?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28225
--- You are receiving
--- Comment #2 from jason at redhat dot com 2006-07-19 20:02 ---
Subject: Re: New: Anon namespace pointers in exported classes
Yes, this is an ODR violation. However, the patch I'm working on will
allow it to compile (as a side effect of other desired changes).
Jason
--
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jun 30 10:39:17 UTC 2006 (revision 115087)
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes10996
#
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_3_4_6_release revision 111785
Native configuration is ia64-linux-gnu (caballero)
=== gpc tests ===
Running target any
FAIL: chief40.pas
FAIL: chuck6.pas
FAIL: fieldw.pas
FAIL: fjf23.pas
FAIL: fjf30b.pas
FAIL: fjf327.pas
FAIL:
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 15 14:57:20 UTC 2006 (revision 115474)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn1.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn2.c
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 15 14:57:20 UTC 2006 (revision 115474)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c36204d
FAIL: cd5014e
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2315
# of unexpected failures2
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
13 matches
Mail list logo
