Re: gfdl gcc documentation packages for non-free: update

2006-09-23 Thread Matthias Klose
Nikita V. Youshchenko writes: Nikita V. Youshchenko writes: Hello. I've updated gcc-4.1 documentation packages (Section: non-free/doc). Packages are no longer debian-native, also several issues have been fixed. Also, I've created gcc-doc-defaults package (Section:

Bug#388246: confirm bug

2006-09-23 Thread neologix
Severity: serious Hi. I'd like to confirm this bug, which is occuring on my Etch box. That's really annonying, and has been there for a couple weeks now. There's no documentation available for gcc, hence the severity.

Incomplete upload found in Debian upload queue

2006-09-23 Thread Archive Administrator
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in the Debian upload queue directory: gcc-snapshot_20060922-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20060922-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20060922-1_amd64.deb gcc-snapshot_20060922.orig.tar.gz This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job

Processing of gcc-snapshot_20060922-1_amd64.changes

2006-09-23 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-snapshot_20060922-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-snapshot_20060922-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20060922.orig.tar.gz gcc-snapshot_20060922-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20060922-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#386228: libgcj7-0 (and by extension libgcj7) packaged such that conflicts are inevitable

2006-09-23 Thread Matthias Klose
Don Armstrong writes: Package: libgcj7-0 Severity: important Version: 4.1.1-13 libgcj7-0 (and by extension libgcj7) are packaged such that any soname increment will result in the old versions of libgcj no longer being installable unless the gcj version is also incremented. won't fix.

Bug#386892: gij-4.1: segfaults on ppc on startup

2006-09-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 386892 + unreproducible thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: forwarded gcj report

2006-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 369873 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29194 Bug#369873: gcj-4.1: fails to import package from project Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29194. tags 369873 + upstream Bug#369873: gcj-4.1: fails to import package

Processed: Re: Bug#386892: gij-4.1: segfaults on ppc on startup

2006-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 386892 + unreproducible Bug#386892: gij-4.1: segfaults on ppc on startup There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#382766: marked as done (gij-4.1: gij-4.1 fails to run jython 2.1)

2006-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 18:42:52 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcj-4.1_4.1.1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: fixed gcj report

2006-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 225434 + fixed-upstream Bug#225434: [PR 13513] problems with static inner classes of interfaces Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream retitle 225434 [PR 13513, fixed in 4.3] problems with static inner classes of interfaces Bug#225434:

Bug#236366: marked as done ([PR 14712] gcj - ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2247)

2006-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 19:56:20 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed at least in 4.1.1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#278642: marked as done (gcj-3.3: gcj segfaults with Jabref)

2006-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:44:16 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gcj-3.3: gcj segfaults with Jabref has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#383311: marked as done (wish: update-alternatives entry for gcj)

2006-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:09:20 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#383311: wish: update-alternatives entry for gcj has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#386228: libgcj7-0 (and by extension libgcj7) packaged such that conflicts are inevitable

2006-09-23 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Matthias Klose wrote: Don Armstrong writes: libgcj7-0 (and by extension libgcj7) are packaged such that any soname increment will result in the old versions of libgcj no longer being installable unless the gcj version is also incremented. won't fix.

Bug#386228: libgcj7-0 (and by extension libgcj7) packaged such that conflicts are inevitable

2006-09-23 Thread Matthias Klose
Don Armstrong writes: It could be that it not being in libgcj7 was a bug, and the placement of libgjsmalsa.so.0 was a bug as well... but at the next soname bump adding unofficial sonames to the shared libraries in /usr/lib/gcj-4.1 would be a good idea to ease transitions. shared objects in

Bug#386228: libgcj7-0 (and by extension libgcj7) packaged such that conflicts are inevitable

2006-09-23 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Matthias Klose wrote: Don Armstrong writes: It could be that it not being in libgcj7 was a bug, and the placement of libgjsmalsa.so.0 was a bug as well... but at the next soname bump adding unofficial sonames to the shared libraries in /usr/lib/gcj-4.1 would be a

Results for 4.2.0 20060922 (experimental) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

2006-09-23 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Sep 22 10:29:59 UTC 2006 (revision 117135) === acats tests === FAIL: c35507m FAIL: cd2a23e FAIL: cdd2a02 FAIL: cxh1001 === acats Summary === # of expected passes2311 # of unexpected failures4 Native configuration is

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

2006-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). # remote status report

Bug#188943: It will be helpful

2006-09-23 Thread Haywood, Blair
Sorry for taking so long to reply. We are sorry to inform you that our product is still not in stores. Currently we are only offering it on our product website and plan on having it in stores come November 2006. As mentioned Dr. Dickens is still recommending a 4 month supply for best results.