Bug#379706: marked as done (g++-4.1: segfaults building boost 1.33.1-5)

2006-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:52:39 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#379706: g++-4.1: segfaults building boost 1.33.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#384562: marked as done (gcc-4.1: ICE on valid due to wrong types in fold)

2006-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:07:15 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gcc-4.1: ICE on valid due to wrong types in fold has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processing of gcj-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_multi.changes

2006-09-27 Thread Archive Administrator
gcj-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libgcj7-dbg_4.1.1-14j1_hppa.deb libgcj7-dbg_4.1.1-14j1_i386.deb gcj-4.1-base_4.1.1-14j1_i386.deb libgcj7-dev_4.1.1-14j1_hppa.deb libgcj7-0_4.1.1-14j1_powerpc.deb gij-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_hppa.deb

Bug#385327: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393

2006-09-27 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-26 01:07]: Please recheck with gcc-4.1.1-14 Isn't this PR28181 (still open)? Or did Roman not close PR tickets? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

gcj-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2006-09-27 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_hppa.deb gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_i386.deb gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_powerpc.deb to

Bug#389539: marked as done (file conflict with java-gcj-compat-dev)

2006-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:02:51 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#389539: fixed in gcj-4.1 4.1.1-14j1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#389713: cpp-3.3: gcc package dependency problem

2006-09-27 Thread Klemens Kasemaa
Package: cpp-3.3 Version: gcc-3.3-base Severity: important Cannot install gcc because of dependency problem: cpp-3.3: Depends: gcc-3.3-base ( 1:3.3.6) but 1:3.3.6-5 is to be installed -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Bug#389713: cpp-3.3: gcc package dependency problem

2006-09-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11:46 AM, Klemens Kasemaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: cpp-3.3 Version: gcc-3.3-base Erm... that's not a version number of the package cpp-3.3. Severity: important Cannot install gcc because of dependency problem: cpp-3.3: Depends: gcc-3.3-base

Bug#389713: marked as done (cpp-3.3: gcc package dependency problem)

2006-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:37:43 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#389713: cpp-3.3: gcc package dependency problem has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processing of java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-3_i386.changes

2006-09-27 Thread Archive Administrator
java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-3.dsc java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-3.diff.gz java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-3_i386.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-3_i386.deb java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-3_i386.deb Greetings,

java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-09-27 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-3_i386.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-3_i386.deb java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-3_i386.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-3_i386.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-3.diff.gz to

Processed: Re: Bug#376797: free(): invalid pointer running piespy

2006-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 376797 gij-4.1 Bug#376797: free(): invalid pointer running piespy Bug reassigned from package `java-gcj-compat' to `gij-4.1'. tags 376797 + moreinfo Bug#376797: free(): invalid pointer running piespy There were no tags set. Tags added:

Bug#388063: marked as done (java-gcj-compat-plugin: What relation with gcjwebplugin??)

2006-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:34:44 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#388063: java-gcj-compat-plugin: What relation with gcjwebplugin?? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#376797: free(): invalid pointer running piespy

2006-09-27 Thread Matthias Klose
reassign 376797 gij-4.1 tags 376797 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with the current gij-4.1 version in unstable. Bryan Donlan writes: Package: java-gcj-compat Version: 1.0.56-2 Severity: normal When I run piespy [1] using the following command:

Bug#388063: java-gcj-compat-plugin: What relation with gcjwebplugin??

2006-09-27 Thread Eugen Dedu
I am sorry to reply. Please note that packet descriptions must be understood by users, not only by experts. So I think more information should be written in the description. People do not know internals of packets. How can one know if it's java-gcj-compat-plugin or gcjwebplugin that he must

Bug#388164: marked as done (java-gcj-compat: Missing manpages for registered alternatives)

2006-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:47:20 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#388164: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.65-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#382414: marked as done (inflated alternatives priority)

2006-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:42:06 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#382414: inflated alternatives priority has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

gnat-4.1 4.1.1-14 FTBFS on powerpc, in configure

2006-09-27 Thread Ludovic Brenta
I'm baffled. gnat-4.1 has built on all archs except powerpc, where it says: Running configure in multilib subdir 64 pwd: /build/buildd/gnat-4.1-4.1.1/build/powerpc-linux-gnu configure: creating cache ./config.cache checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no [...]

[Bug target/29230] [4.1 regression] gcc-4.1 generates faulty asm on ARM when compiling openmsx 0.6.1 with -O3

2006-09-27 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-27 17:10 --- Subject: Bug 29230 Author: pbrook Date: Wed Sep 27 17:09:40 2006 New Revision: 117253 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117253 Log: 2006-09-27 Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug target/29230] [4.1 regression] gcc-4.1 generates faulty asm on ARM when compiling openmsx 0.6.1 with -O3

2006-09-27 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-27 17:10 --- Subject: Bug 29230 Author: pbrook Date: Wed Sep 27 17:10:22 2006 New Revision: 117254 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117254 Log: 2006-09-27 Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug target/29230] [4.1 regression] gcc-4.1 generates faulty asm on ARM when compiling openmsx 0.6.1 with -O3

2006-09-27 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-27 17:11 --- Fixed. -- pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

Bug#376797: marked as done (free(): invalid pointer running piespy)

2006-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:36:20 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#376797: free(): invalid pointer running piespy has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#376797: free(): invalid pointer running piespy

2006-09-27 Thread Bryan Donlan
Version: 4.1.1-14 Works now, thanks :) On 9/27/06, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: reassign 376797 gij-4.1 tags 376797 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with the current gij-4.1 version in unstable. Bryan Donlan writes: Package: java-gcj-compat Version: 1.0.56-2 Severity: normal

Problems with g++ (Was: Re: A plan to get rid of unnecessary package dependencies)

2006-09-27 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Christian Aichinger wrote: As Steve Langasek detailed in his d-d-a mail[1], unnecessary dependencies cause lots of problems, as they make transitions bigger then they need to be. Sorry for the noise. I wrote earlier to Christian Aichinger (and submitted a report