Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:52:39 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#379706: g++-4.1: segfaults building boost 1.33.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:07:15 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gcc-4.1: ICE on valid due to wrong types in fold
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
gcj-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libgcj7-dbg_4.1.1-14j1_hppa.deb
libgcj7-dbg_4.1.1-14j1_i386.deb
gcj-4.1-base_4.1.1-14j1_i386.deb
libgcj7-dev_4.1.1-14j1_hppa.deb
libgcj7-0_4.1.1-14j1_powerpc.deb
gij-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_hppa.deb
* Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-26 01:07]:
Please recheck with gcc-4.1.1-14
Isn't this PR28181 (still open)? Or did Roman not close PR tickets?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Accepted:
gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_hppa.deb
gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_i386.deb
gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14j1_powerpc.deb
to
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:02:51 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#389539: fixed in gcj-4.1 4.1.1-14j1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: cpp-3.3
Version: gcc-3.3-base
Severity: important
Cannot install gcc because of dependency problem:
cpp-3.3: Depends: gcc-3.3-base ( 1:3.3.6) but 1:3.3.6-5 is to be installed
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Hi,
On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11:46 AM, Klemens Kasemaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Package: cpp-3.3
Version: gcc-3.3-base
Erm... that's not a version number of the package cpp-3.3.
Severity: important
Cannot install gcc because of dependency problem:
cpp-3.3: Depends: gcc-3.3-base
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:37:43 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#389713: cpp-3.3: gcc package dependency problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-3.dsc
java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-3.diff.gz
java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-3_i386.deb
java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-3_i386.deb
java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Accepted:
java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-3_i386.deb
java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-3_i386.deb
java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-3.diff.gz
to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 376797 gij-4.1
Bug#376797: free(): invalid pointer running piespy
Bug reassigned from package `java-gcj-compat' to `gij-4.1'.
tags 376797 + moreinfo
Bug#376797: free(): invalid pointer running piespy
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:34:44 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#388063: java-gcj-compat-plugin: What relation with
gcjwebplugin??
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
reassign 376797 gij-4.1
tags 376797 + moreinfo
thanks
please recheck with the current gij-4.1 version in unstable.
Bryan Donlan writes:
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.56-2
Severity: normal
When I run piespy [1] using the following command:
I am sorry to reply. Please note that packet descriptions must be
understood by users, not only by experts.
So I think more information should be written in the description.
People do not know internals of packets. How can one know if it's
java-gcj-compat-plugin or gcjwebplugin that he must
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:47:20 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#388164: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.65-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:42:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#382414: inflated alternatives priority
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
I'm baffled.
gnat-4.1 has built on all archs except powerpc, where it says:
Running configure in multilib subdir 64
pwd: /build/buildd/gnat-4.1-4.1.1/build/powerpc-linux-gnu
configure: creating cache ./config.cache
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
[...]
--- Comment #7 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-27 17:10 ---
Subject: Bug 29230
Author: pbrook
Date: Wed Sep 27 17:09:40 2006
New Revision: 117253
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117253
Log:
2006-09-27 Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #8 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-27 17:10 ---
Subject: Bug 29230
Author: pbrook
Date: Wed Sep 27 17:10:22 2006
New Revision: 117254
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117254
Log:
2006-09-27 Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-27 17:11 ---
Fixed.
--
pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:36:20 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#376797: free(): invalid pointer running piespy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Version: 4.1.1-14
Works now, thanks :)
On 9/27/06, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
reassign 376797 gij-4.1
tags 376797 + moreinfo
thanks
please recheck with the current gij-4.1 version in unstable.
Bryan Donlan writes:
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.56-2
Severity: normal
Hello,
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Christian Aichinger wrote:
As Steve Langasek detailed in his d-d-a mail[1], unnecessary
dependencies cause lots of problems, as they make transitions
bigger then they need to be.
Sorry for the noise. I wrote earlier to Christian Aichinger
(and submitted a report
24 matches
Mail list logo