--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 02:40 ---
Reduced testcase:
struct node234_Tag
{
int t1;
int kids[4];
void *elems[3];
};
void *add234_internal(struct node234_Tag *n, int ei)
{
int j;
for (j = ei; j < 2 && n->elems[j+1];)
j++;
n->kids[j+
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 02:13 ---
Works with:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc]$ ./xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: arm-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --target=arm-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.2 20061007 (prerelease)
--
http
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 02:10 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> compilation with -O0:
>
> $ gcc -c -fPIC -g -O0 -g tree234.i
> /tmp/cco6vA7j.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/cco6vA7j.s:172: Error: Rn must not overlap other operands -- `swpb
> r3,r2,[r3]'
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 02:05 ---
Works on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc]$ ./xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: arm-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --target=arm-linux-gnu : (reconfigured)
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.0 20061007
The removal of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set.
Date of this removal: Sat Oct 7 18:04:24 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
--
> a buildd problem, not a package problem; will be fixed tonight.
has this been fixed and if so has the guifrications build been requeued?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The subscription of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set. Thanks for subscribing!
Date of this subscription: Sat Oct 7 16:26:17 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
-
pcarlini at suse dot de writes:
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-07 17:28 ---
> Forgot to add: after having properly switched to a wchar_t stream, we must
> make
> sure that it actually does the conversion: the clean solution via std::codecvt
> is used by defaul
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-07 19:48 ---
*** Bug 29379 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-07 19:48 ---
... to mark it as duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16006 ***
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-07 19:47 ---
Reopen...
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
Your message dated Sat, 7 Oct 2006 20:31:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Bug libstdc++/29379] bad thousand separator with UTF-8 locales
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-07 17:28 ---
Forgot to add: after having properly switched to a wchar_t stream, we must make
sure that it actually does the conversion: the clean solution via std::codecvt
is used by default only in converting streams (file streams), wh
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-07 17:03 ---
This a well known not a bug (I'm sure similar issues are discussed in the
mailing list, also user code implementing char <-> char conversions via iconv):
output to UTF-8 is done by wchar_t streams (thus, for example, wcout
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 351786 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29379
Bug#351786: libstdc++6: bad thousand separator with fr_FR.UTF-8
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29379.
> tags 351786 + upstream
Bug#351786: libstdc++6: bad thousand se
Your message dated Sat, 7 Oct 2006 16:23:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libmudflap0: libmudflapth doesn't report simple bounds
violations, libmudflap does.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 7 Oct 2006 16:09:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386121: libstdc++6: Incompatibility with older
libgcc_s.so.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Accepted:
cpp_4.1.1-11_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.1.1-11_i386.deb
g++_4.1.1-11_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4.1.1-11_i386.deb
g77_3.4.6-15_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77_3.4.6-15_i386.deb
gcc-defaults_1.46.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc-defaults_1
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gpc-doc_3.4.6-15_i386.deb: package says section is doc, override says devel.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package wro
gcc-defaults_1.46_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-defaults_1.46.dsc
gcc-defaults_1.46.tar.gz
libgcj-common_4.1.1-17_all.deb
cpp_4.1.1-11_i386.deb
gcc_4.1.1-11_i386.deb
gnat_4.1.1-11_i386.deb
g++_4.1.1-11_i386.deb
gobjc_4.1.1-11_i386.deb
go
red-hot teeens in bukkaake actionn.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The removal of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set.
Date of this removal: Sat Oct 7 01:51:24 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 391445 normal
Bug#391445: gcc-4.1: cross-compile broken for powerpc: Link tests are not
allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of me
23 matches
Mail list logo
