hi Darius i hope this is your email.
I was glad to meet you the other day. I expect you are truly had like the New
York.
So much so much happening all the time, lots of great opportunities.
And speaking of opportunities, the deal I was speaking you about other day
included a company
known as
hi Kate i hope this is your mailbox.
I was pleased to meet you the other day. I hope you was excited about New
York.
So much so much happening all the time, lots of great opportunities.
And speaking of opportunities, the deal I was speaking you about yesterday
embraces a company
called
hi Cameron i hope this is your mailbox.
I was like to see you the other day. I hope you are actually had like the New
York.
So much so much happening all the time, lots of great opportunities.
And speaking of opportunities, the deal I was speaking you about yesterday
embraces a company
named
hi Ina i hope this is your e-mail.
I was pleased to meet you the other day. I expect you are actually had like the
New York.
So much so much happening all the time, lots of great opportunities.
And speaking of opportunities, the deal I was speaking you about other day
embraces a company
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-18 09:26
---
A backport of the patch bootstraps regtests ok on the 4.1 branch, but I'm
unsure we want the side-effects of the rejects-valid, because this is valid
code according to jsm (only undefined at runtime).
--
Version: 4.2-20061003-1
Severity: important
Package: gcc-4.2
Tags: patch
Hello,
Due to nonexistence of file patches/cross-fixes.dpatch, gcc-4.2 fails to
build
the crosscompiler. (Message is ... no rule to make target
stamp-xxx-cross-fixes)
Please, add the file to make it work.
Reagrds
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.65-7
Severity: serious
Hello,
Automatic build of db4.5_4.5.20-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
Build started at 20061018-0941
**
...
Unpacking java-gcj-compat (from .../java-gcj
.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.65-7
Severity: serious
Hello,
Automatic build of db4.5_4.5.20-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
Build started at 20061018-0941
Accepted:
java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-8_i386.deb
java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-8_i386.deb
java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8.diff.gz
to
--
ian at davenant dot greenend dot org dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at davenant dot greenend
|
--- Comment #2 from ian at davenant dot greenend dot org dot uk 2006-10-18
15:11 ---
Again this is a policy issue rather than really a bug, I am
thinking about closing this as invalid as I thought our policy is clear.
I'm afraid I don't understand. What policy are you referring to
--
pmaydell at chiark dot greenend dot org dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pmaydell at chiark dot
|
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found #385732 1.47
Bug#385732: gcc-defaults: Non-free files in source package
Bug marked as found in version 1.47.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
found #385732 1.47
thanks
In version 1.47, fsf-funding.7 is in the source tarball again.
Reopening the bug,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shouldn't this bug be closed, now that gcc-4.1-doc is available in
non-free and gcc-doc has moved to contrib?
Kind regards,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at redhat dot com
java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb
java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb
java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
gcc-defaults_1.48_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-defaults_1.48.dsc
gcc-defaults_1.48.tar.gz
cpp_4.1.1-13_i386.deb
gcc_4.1.1-13_i386.deb
gnat_4.1.1-13_i386.deb
g++_4.1.1-13_i386.deb
gobjc_4.1.1-13_i386.deb
gobjc++_4.1.1-13_i386.deb
Accepted:
java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb
java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb
java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-8_m68k.deb
to
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:24:11 +0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 351786
Bug#351786: [PR29379] bad thousand separator with UTF-8 locales
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
severity 351786 wishlist
Bug#351786: [PR29379] bad thousand separator with UTF-8 locales
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-18 18:56
---
(In reply to comment #17)
A backport of the patch bootstraps regtests ok on the 4.1 branch.
Except it introduces PR 29478.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
# remote status report for
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #356316
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR7302
# * remote status changed: NEW - ASSIGNED
usertags 356316 -
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #377613
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26881
# * remote status changed: ASSIGNED - RESOLVED
# * remote
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gpc-doc_3.4.6-17_i386.deb: package says section is doc, override says devel.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package
Accepted:
cpp_4.1.1-13_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.1.1-13_i386.deb
g++_4.1.1-13_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4.1.1-13_i386.deb
g77_3.4.6-17_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77_3.4.6-17_i386.deb
gcc-defaults_1.48.dsc
to
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:48:53 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#385732: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.48
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Oct 15 09:03:58 UTC 2006 (revision 117742)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c35507m
FAIL: c99005a
FAIL: cd2a23e
FAIL: cxh1001
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2311
# of unexpected failures4
Native configuration is
Package: gcc-4.1Version: 4.1.1-16gcc-4.1 has a typo when looking for 64 bit libraries on s390.I names path as ../s390-linux/lib64 but it is ../s390-linux-gnu/lib64Patch available
I am using Debian GNU/Linux 2.4.1, kernel 2.6.18-1-xen-vserver-amd64 and libc6 2.3.6.ds1-6
s390-typo.patch
Hector Oron writes:
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-16
gcc-4.1 has a typo when looking for 64 bit libraries on s390.
I names path as ../s390-linux/lib64 but it is ../s390-linux-gnu/lib64
hmm, care to elaborate?
Patch available
please send it.
thanks, Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
31 matches
Mail list logo
