[Bug tree-optimization/28624] [4.2/4.3 regression] latent segfault in remove_phi_node

2006-12-12 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-12-12 10:57 --- (In reply to comment #5) The problem is EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP does not like the bitmap to change from underneath it. I have a patch which fixes this issue. Wow, nice you tracked this down. I thought this bug

[bts-link] source package gcj-4.1

2006-12-12 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #397817 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29783 # * remote status changed: (?) - NEW usertags 397817 + status-NEW

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

2006-12-12 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #397341 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30131 # * remote status changed: (?) - UNCONFIRMED usertags 397341 +

[Bug libstdc++/11953] _REENTRANT defined when compiling non-threaded code.

2006-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #43 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 15:15 --- Subject: Bug 11953 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 12 15:15:19 2006 New Revision: 119788 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119788 Log: PR libstdc++/11953 * gthr-posix.h (_REENTRANT):

[Bug libstdc++/11953] _REENTRANT defined when compiling non-threaded code.

2006-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #44 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 15:22 --- Subject: Bug 11953 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 12 15:21:53 2006 New Revision: 119789 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119789 Log: PR libstdc++/11953 * gthr-posix.h (_REENTRANT):

[Bug libstdc++/11953] _REENTRANT defined when compiling non-threaded code.

2006-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #45 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 15:24 --- Subject: Bug 11953 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 12 15:24:07 2006 New Revision: 119790 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119790 Log: PR libstdc++/11953 * gthr-posix.h (_REENTRANT):

[Bug tree-optimization/28624] [4.2/4.3 regression] latent segfault in remove_phi_node

2006-12-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 17:12 --- (In reply to comment #6) Wow, nice you tracked this down. I thought this bug would stay open forever as unreproducible. I only tracked it down because of the duplicate to this bug. --

Processed: 4.0 bugs - 4.1 bugs

2006-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 33975 g++-4.1 Bug#33975: [PR c++/6905] Suggested g++ warning: changed semantics of conditional expressions Warning: Unknown package 'g++-4.0' Bug reassigned from package `g++-4.0' to `g++-4.1'. reassign 117563 g++-4.1 Bug#117563: [known

[Bug tree-optimization/28624] [4.2/4.3 regression] latent segfault in remove_phi_node

2006-12-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |

Processed: Re: Bug#402794: gcc segmentation fault compiling asterisk 1.2.13

2006-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 402794 gcc-3.3 Bug#402794: gcc segmentation fault compiling asterisk 1.2.13 Warning: Unknown package 'gcc-3.3.5' Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.3.5' to `gcc-3.3'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

[Bug tree-optimization/28624] [4.2/4.3 regression] latent segfault in remove_phi_node

2006-12-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 22:45 --- Subject: Bug 28624 Author: pinskia Date: Tue Dec 12 22:45:25 2006 New Revision: 119802 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119802 Log: 2006-12-12 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug tree-optimization/28624] [4.2 regression] latent segfault in remove_phi_node

2006-12-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 22:45 --- Fixed in 4.3.0, will test for the 4.2 branch later this week or during the weekend. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#402794: gcc segmentation fault compiling asterisk 1.2.13

2006-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 402794 asterisk Bug#402794: gcc segmentation fault compiling asterisk 1.2.13 Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.3' to `asterisk'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#402794: Processed: Re: Bug#402794: gcc segmentation fault compiling asterisk 1.2.13

2006-12-12 Thread Matthias Klose
reassign 402794 asterisk thanks please recheck if that's still reproducible with current compilers in etch; if not, please close the report as wontfix. Debian Bug Tracking System writes: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 402794 gcc-3.3 Bug#402794: gcc segmentation fault