priority change on your package(s)

In fixing bug #301138, several packages have been lowered to optional priority from standard priority, reflecting that our standard user is not a developer, and should not have a development environment installed. If you're on the cc list, your package(s) have been affected. Here's the

Processed: reassign java-gcj-compat report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 403381 eclipse Bug#403381: Cannot start eclipse: java-gcj-compatible complains missing NS_InitEmbedding Bug reassigned from package `java-gcj-compat' to `eclipse'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Welcome to Al-Manahel Newsletter List

The subscription of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Thanks for subscribing! Date of this subscription: Wed Jan 3 10:39:30 2007 Please save this email message for future reference.

Processing of gcc-3.3_3.3.6ds1-15_i386.changes

gcc-3.3_3.3.6ds1-15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.3_3.3.6ds1-15.dsc gcc-3.3_3.3.6ds1-15.diff.gz libstdc++5-3.3-doc_3.3.6-15_all.deb gcc-3.3-base_3.3.6-15_i386.deb cpp-3.3_3.3.6-15_i386.deb g++-3.3_3.3.6-15_i386.deb

gcc-3.3_3.3.6ds1-15_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.3_3.3.6-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.6-15_i386.deb g++-3.3_3.3.6-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/g++-3.3_3.3.6-15_i386.deb gcc-3.3-base_3.3.6-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/gcc-3.3-base_3.3.6-15_i386.deb gcc-3.3_3.3.6-15_i386.deb to

Processing of gcc-3.4_3.4.6ds1-5_multi.changes

gcc-3.4_3.4.6ds1-5_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: g77-3.4_3.4.6-5_powerpc.deb lib64g2c0_3.4.6-5_i386.deb libg2c0_3.4.6-5_i386.deb gcc-3.4_3.4.6-5_powerpc.deb libstdc++6-pic_3.4.6-5_i386.deb libstdc++6-doc_3.4.6-5_all.deb

gcc-3.4_3.4.6ds1-5_multi.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.4_3.4.6-5_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.6-5_i386.deb cpp-3.4_3.4.6-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.6-5_powerpc.deb g++-3.4_3.4.6-5_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g++-3.4_3.4.6-5_i386.deb g++-3.4_3.4.6-5_powerpc.deb to

Processing of java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-9_i386.changes

java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-9.dsc java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-9.diff.gz java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-9_i386.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-9_i386.deb java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-9_i386.deb Greetings,

java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-9_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-9_i386.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.65-9_i386.deb java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-9_i386.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-plugin_1.0.65-9_i386.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.65-9.diff.gz to

Bug#392735: marked as done (java-gcj-compat: dangling symlinks in /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/man/man1)

Your message dated Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#392735: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.65-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#388164: marked as done (java-gcj-compat: Missing manpages for registered alternatives)

Your message dated Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#388164: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.65-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Results for 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-14) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes8194 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures