defines need to have changed. Therefor I'm
really not sure who's at fault here.
| Automatic build of gcc-snapshot_20061217-1 on meitner by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started at 20070221-1317
| **
| Checking available source
--- Comment #14 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-02-22 00:13 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Already posted as http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00885.html,
with no response.
this patch doesn't cover one situation:
struct D;
struct C {
virtual void f() = 0;
--- Comment #15 from ben at decadent dot org dot uk 2007-02-22 01:10
---
Pawel: Yes, any friend class or function can call a protected or private
destructor wrongly. So can members of the class - in fact, even pure virtual
members can, since they may still have definitions!
The
--- Comment #16 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-02-22 02:02 ---
quite better ( modulo coding style ) patch is:
--- class.c.orig2006-10-12 22:02:53.0 +0200
+++ class.c 2007-02-22 02:54:11.888652367 +0100
@@ -5105,15 +5105,15 @@
tree dtor;
dtor =
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 396583 libgcj-common
Bug#396583: libgcj-common: Link to gcj-4.1-base makes checksums mismatch
Bug reassigned from package `debsums' to `libgcj-common'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
5 matches
Mail list logo
