Bug#416629: src/wdm/access.o:(.debug_info+0xb64): undefined reference to `.L159'

2007-03-29 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20060326-1 I'll report to upstream when I have a small testcase. Automatic build of wdm_1.28-2.2 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.53 ... gcc -L./bin -L/usr/X11R6/lib src/wdm/Greet.o src/wdm/access.o src/wdm/auth.o src/wdm/choose.o src/wdm/daemon.o src/wdm/dm.o

Processed: Re: Bug#416629: Acknowledgement (src/wdm/access.o:(.debug_info+0xb64): undefined reference to `.L159')

2007-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 416629 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31391 Bug#416629: src/wdm/access.o:(.debug_info+0xb64): undefined reference to `.L159' Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31391. tags 416629 + upstream Bug#416629:

[Bug tree-optimization/31169] Bootstrap comparison error at revision 122821

2007-03-29 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #33 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-29 17:30 --- I've been trying to track down this same failure on Alpha. I can reproduce that reverting the third hunk allows the bootstrap to complete. Finding what has got miscompiled has been very difficult. Only two files

[Bug tree-optimization/31169] Bootstrap comparison error at revision 122821

2007-03-29 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #34 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-29 18:13 --- Actually, on second thought, I don't think the sign_bit_p change is legit: Value ranges after VRP: -mask_lo_1: [0, +INF] EQUIVALENCES: { } (0 elements) +mask_lo_1: [0x0, +INF] EQUIVALENCES: { } (0

[Bug tree-optimization/31169] Bootstrap comparison error at revision 122821

2007-03-29 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #35 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-29 18:21 --- With some sed help, one can see that fold_binary is completely ruined: - mhi = 0x0 128 - width; - if ((~(hi2 | hi1) mhi) == 0) goto L; else goto L; - -L:; - mlo = 0x0; + mhi = 0;

Bug#416704: reportbug-g++-20070329-12960-Tq7l2a

2007-03-29 Thread guido schillaci
Subject: ../sysdeps/i386/elf/start.S:115: undefined reference to `main' Package: g++-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-21 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source *** Please type your report below this line *** I would compile a cpp source but when compiling with g++ -o VelocityModel

Bug#416705: ../sysdeps/i386/elf/start.S:115: undefined reference to `main'

2007-03-29 Thread Guido Schillaci
Package: g++-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-21 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source I would compile a cpp source but when compiling with g++ -o VelocityModel VelocityModel.cc i receive this error /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib/crt1.o: In function `_start':

Welcome to Al-Manahel Newsletter List

2007-03-29 Thread munir
The subscription of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Thanks for subscribing! Date of this subscription: Thu Mar 29 15:20:47 2007 Please save this email message for future reference.

Bug#416705: marked as done (../sysdeps/i386/elf/start.S:115: undefined reference to `main')

2007-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:57:54 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#416705: ../sysdeps/i386/elf/start.S:115: undefined reference to `main' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#416704: marked as done (reportbug-g++-20070329-12960-Tq7l2a)

2007-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:57:54 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#416705: ../sysdeps/i386/elf/start.S:115: undefined reference to `main' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt