LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 29 20:44:29 UTC 2007 (revision 124285)
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 29 20:44:29 UTC 2007 (revision 124285)
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
=== g+
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 29 20:44:29 UTC 2007 (revision 124285)
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
=
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 29 20:44:29 UTC 2007 (revision 124285)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
===
--- Comment #21 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-05-07 11:11 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00390.html
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> Package: gcj-4.1
> Version: 4.1.2-4
> Severity: normal
>
> I recently upgraded gcj (and/or ecj?) and now a couple of GDB tests fail.
> To see the problem, take this file:
>
> public class jmain
> {
> public static void main (String[] args)
> {
> return;
>
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 09:47:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421362: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 09:47:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422421: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.2-6_hppa.deb: package says section is libs, override says
devel.
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.2-6_i386.deb: package says section is libs, override says
devel.
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.2-6_po
Accepted:
cpp-4.1_4.1.2-6_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.2-6_hppa.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.2-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.2-6_i386.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.2-6_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.2-6_powerpc.deb
fixincludes_4.1.2-6_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fix
gcc-4.1_4.1.2-6_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libobjc1_4.1.2-6_i386.deb
lib64stdc++6-4.1-dbg_4.1.2-6_i386.deb
gfortran-4.1_4.1.2-6_hppa.deb
libffi4_4.1.2-6_i386.deb
libstdc++6-4.1-dev_4.1.2-6_hppa.deb
gfortran-4.1-multilib_4.1.2-6_i386.deb
libs
--- Comment #20 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-05-07 08:51 ---
Following one-liner fixes the failure. Note that this is for i386 only, as we
also need to skip other autoinc/autodec references.
This is now a generic RTL problem.
2007-05-07 Uros Bizjak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Your message dated Mon, 7 May 2007 09:40:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
--- Comment #19 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-05-07 08:19 ---
Here is the problem:
Compilation enteres emit_move_via_integer() with:
x = (mem/i:SD (pre_dec:SI (reg/f:SI 7 sp)) [0 S4 A32])
y = (reg/v:SD 59 [ arg ])
emit_move_change_mode() generates invalid insn from x because it fo
14 matches
Mail list logo
