[Bug tree-optimization/32589] [4.3 Regression] exp_dbug.adb:981: error: invalid array index

2007-07-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-05 08:38 --- FWIW, I haven't been able to bootstrap on ppc64-linux-gnu after this patch went in. I'm not sure I'd tried a full bootstrap before (I've only very recently got easy access to a ppc box), but the failure is

your libssp change

2007-07-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Your change * rules2, rules.defs, rules.conf: $(with_libssp): remove, use only $(with_ssp). Fixes a bug whereby libssp was always built as part of gnat-4.2. is wrong; it doesn't work on platforms where ssp is enabled, but the target libc doesn't support ssp (and therefore the libssp

Re: gcc-4.2 upload

2007-07-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Ludovic Brenta writes: Did I mention I hated Subversion and svk? Why don't we just migrate to a proper distributed version control system? Please? CCing debian-gcc@, as I think a choice of VCS concerns the other maintainers as well. Sorry, we can't switch to a new VCS each time a

Bug#431865: gcj-4.1 FTBFS on hppa

2007-07-05 Thread Andreas Barth
Package: gcj-4.1 Version: 4.1.2-12 Severity: serious Hi, this package FTBFS on hppa, please see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gcj-4.1ver=4.1.2-12arch=hppastamp=1181614009file=log /build/buildd/gcj-4.1-4.1.2/build/gcc/gcj -B/build/buildd/gcj-4.1-4.1.2/build/hppa-linux-gnu/libjava/

[Bug tree-optimization/32589] [4.3 Regression] exp_dbug.adb:981: error: invalid array index

2007-07-05 Thread schwab at suse dot de
-- schwab at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schwab at suse dot de http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32589

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-07-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may miss another backport from the trunk. Did someone check already ? Side note: gcc-snapshot currently cannot be built due to the too strict

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-07-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may miss another backport from the trunk. Did someone check already ? Probably

reverted ssp/ffi/gomp changes

2007-07-05 Thread Matthias Klose
sorry, I reverted these changes from r2167; gcj did fail to build, because the gcj build gets configured with --disable-libffi. there is a distinction of building the compiler with this support, and building packages from it. If you think the savings in not building these while building gnat are

Re: reverted ssp/ffi/gomp changes

2007-07-05 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: sorry, I reverted these changes from r2167; gcj did fail to build, because the gcj build gets configured with --disable-libffi. Well the problem then is at rules.defs:753, where gcj explicitly disables libffi by setting with_libffi := no. there is a

[Bug tree-optimization/32589] [4.3 Regression] exp_dbug.adb:981: error: invalid array index

2007-07-05 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-06 00:36 --- FWIW, ppc-linux-gnu bootstrap failed with the same tree, but reverting to before the 2007-06-30 patch it worked again. ppc64-linux-gnu still failed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32589 ---