--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-05 08:38
---
FWIW, I haven't been able to bootstrap on ppc64-linux-gnu after this patch
went
in. I'm not sure I'd tried a full bootstrap before (I've only very recently
got easy access to a ppc box), but the failure is
Your change
* rules2, rules.defs, rules.conf: $(with_libssp): remove, use only
$(with_ssp). Fixes a bug whereby libssp was always built as part
of gnat-4.2.
is wrong; it doesn't work on platforms where ssp is enabled, but the
target libc doesn't support ssp (and therefore the libssp
Ludovic Brenta writes:
Did I mention I hated Subversion and svk? Why don't we just migrate
to a proper distributed version control system? Please?
CCing debian-gcc@, as I think a choice of VCS concerns the other
maintainers as well.
Sorry, we can't switch to a new VCS each time a
Package: gcj-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-12
Severity: serious
Hi,
this package FTBFS on hppa, please see
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gcj-4.1ver=4.1.2-12arch=hppastamp=1181614009file=log
/build/buildd/gcj-4.1-4.1.2/build/gcc/gcj
-B/build/buildd/gcj-4.1-4.1.2/build/hppa-linux-gnu/libjava/
--
schwab at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schwab at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32589
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
miss another backport from the trunk.
Did someone check already ?
Side note: gcc-snapshot currently cannot be built due to the too
strict
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
miss another backport from the trunk.
Did someone check already ?
Probably
sorry, I reverted these changes from r2167; gcj did fail to build,
because the gcj build gets configured with --disable-libffi. there is
a distinction of building the compiler with this support, and building
packages from it. If you think the savings in not building these while
building gnat are
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sorry, I reverted these changes from r2167; gcj did fail to build,
because the gcj build gets configured with --disable-libffi.
Well the problem then is at rules.defs:753, where gcj explicitly
disables libffi by setting with_libffi := no.
there is
a
--- Comment #7 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-06 00:36 ---
FWIW, ppc-linux-gnu bootstrap failed with the same tree, but reverting to
before the 2007-06-30 patch it worked again. ppc64-linux-gnu still failed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32589
---
10 matches
Mail list logo