Bug#474644: libffi4-dev Provides: libffi-dev, but does not appear to actually be compatible

2008-04-06 Thread Nathaniel Smith
Package: libffi4-dev Version: 4.1.2-6 Severity: normal I have python-gobject-dev installed; python-gobject-dev Depends: on libffi-dev. On my system, this dependency was satisfied by libffi4-dev, because libffi4-dev Provides: libffi-dev. However, this leaves me with a broken python-gobject-dev pa

Bug#438641: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s

2008-04-06 Thread Loïc Minier
tag 438641 - moreinfo stop On Wed, Jan 23, 2008, Matthias Klose wrote: > tag 438641 + moreinfo > please recheck with gcc-4.3 and provide a use case for the request > (using libtool and explicitely specifying -lgcc? why?) It's reproducible with gcc-4.3. The use case is to provide a lib with mi

Processed: Re: Bug#438641: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s

2008-04-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 438641 - moreinfo Bug#438641: gcc does not permit mixing -shared and -static objects when linking (or: please pass -static-libgcc automatically) Tags were: moreinfo Tags removed: moreinfo > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#472854: gnat-4.3 needs a manual build for mips and mipsel

2008-04-06 Thread grave
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 10:44:33PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> Aurelien Jarno writes: >> > I have just checked-in a patch in the SVN to fix this problem. >> >> Thanks a lot! I'll upload it as part of 4.3.0-3 immediately after >> gcc-4.3 4.3.0-3. >> >> > BTW is there any reason to keep the MIP

Bug#472854: gnat-4.3 needs a manual build for mips and mipsel

2008-04-06 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 10:44:33PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Aurelien Jarno writes: > > I have just checked-in a patch in the SVN to fix this problem. > > Thanks a lot! I'll upload it as part of 4.3.0-3 immediately after > gcc-4.3 4.3.0-3. > > > BTW is there any reason to keep the MIPS suppo

Re: [alpha, amd64, hppa, i386] GCC-4.3 as the default compilers for lenny?

2008-04-06 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 08:04:15PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 08:30:54PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > Sigh, could we avoid the same discussion over and over, people are not > > supposed (we never asked it in the past, and I see no valid reason to do > > so) to update