the gcc-4.2 multilib is installed,
Package: gcc-multilib
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: devel
Installed-Size: 20
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
Architecture: amd64
Source: gcc-defaults (1.69)
Version: 4:4.2.3-7
but it seems this is
It works here in an up-to-date sid chroot:
% gcc-4.2 -m32 hello.c file a.out
a.out: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux
2.6.8, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped
Please give me the result of:
% dpkg -l gcc gcc-4.2 gcc-multilib
Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.69
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hello,
when building 'gcc-defaults' on ppc64/unstable, I get the following error:
dh_gencontrol -pgcc-multilib -u-v4:4.3.0-4
dh_gencontrol -pgnat -u-v4.3.0-4
dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'ppc64' does not
I'd be happy to add support for ppc64 but this requires that gnat-4.3
is known to work on that architecture. Is that the case? I can't see
it on http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/buildd-logs.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hello,
thanks for your quick reply!
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 02:28:24PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
I'd be happy to add support for ppc64 but this requires that gnat-4.3
is known to work on that architecture. Is that the case? I can't see
it on
Andreas Jochens writes:
Yes, gnat-4.3 works on ppc64, finally! It took quite a while to
bootstrap gnat-4.3 on ppc64.
However, the current version of the debian/patches/ppc64-ada.dpatch
in the gnat-4.3/gcc-4.3 package still needs to be updated.
I will file a separate bug report to the
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:16:13PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Great. Do you thing gcc-defaults depends on this new patch and should
therefore wait for it?
the current unstable version 1.70 of the 'gcc-defaults' package FTBFS
on ppc64 anyway at the moment because no_packages = gnat
Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:16:13PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Great. Do you thing gcc-defaults depends on this new patch and should
therefore wait for it?
the current unstable version 1.70 of the 'gcc-defaults' package FTBFS
on ppc64
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog(révision 3018)
+++ debian/changelog(copie de travail)
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+gcc-defaults (1.71) unstable;
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Index: debian/rules
===
--- debian/rules(révision 3018)
+++ debian/rules(copie de travail)
@@ -256,6 +256,10 @@
no_packages += gcc-spu g++-spu
Arthur Loiret writes:
Hope I'm not wrong again...
ifeq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ppc64))
no_packages += gnat
endif
You disabled gnat on all archs but ppc64. This should be ifneq.
This time you are right! I blindly pasted the previous ifeq.
Thanks for spotting this. There is a
Package: gnat-4.3
Version: 4.3.0-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hello,
the current debian/ppc64-ada.dpatch has to be updated for gnat-4.3.
With the attached patch 'gnat-4.3' can be built on ppc64.
The resulting new debian/ppc64-ada.dpatch does the following:
* add the new files
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
As I learned the hard way, it is a bad idea to try to build gnat
before gnat-4.3 is available. Therefore I just committed this patch
to gcc-defaults. The moment you produce gnat-4.3 for ppc64, I'll add
support for it in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 278685 fixed-upstream pending
Bug#278685: accepts extension aggregate where expexted type is not extension
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream, pending
retitle 278685 [Fixed in 4.4] accepts extension aggregate where expected type
is
FYI: The status of the libffi source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 3.0.4-2
Current version: 3.0.5-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:54:13AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Have you narrowed done the problem to find if it is a gcc bug or a
kernel bug?
It fails with gcc-4.3, and works fine with all previous versions...
Don't get
16 matches
Mail list logo
