Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.78-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
*** Please type your report below this line ***
After upgrading my system, a java program failed to run because the java
alternative was overwritten from the previously selected sun java.
-- System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 479950 + moreinfo
Bug#479950: java-gcj: java alternative overwritten
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
tag 479950 + moreinfo
thanks
Blars Blarson writes:
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.78-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
*** Please type your report below this line ***
After upgrading my system, a java program failed to run because the java
alternative was
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #107123
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR3507
# * remote status changed: (?) - ASSIGNED
usertags 107123 +
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #356316
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR7302
# * remote status changed: (?) - ASSIGNED
usertags 356316 +
gcj-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcj-4.2-base_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
gij-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
libgcj8-1_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
libgcj8-1-awt_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
libgcj8-dev_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
Accepted:
gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
gcj-4.2-base_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gcj-4.2-base_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
gcj-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gcj-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
gij-4.2_4.2.3-4_m68k.deb
to
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:04:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
After upgrading my system, a java program failed to run because the java
alternative was overwritten from the previously selected sun java.
maybe this works for the simple case, but how is it technically
possible to keep an
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:04:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
maybe this works for the simple case, but how is it technically
possible to keep an alternative in manual state, if you change
priority, add or remove slave links?
Neither of these actions cause the manual status to change since
9 matches
Mail list logo