patch 480798 + patch
thanks
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Package: gcj-4.1
Severity: wishlist
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: xulrunner-transition
With the upcoming xulrunner transition, libxul-dev is going to disappear.
I already sent instructions on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27
tags 480798 + patch
Bug#480798: Don't build depend on libxul-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 480798 + wontfix
Bug#480798: Don't build depend on libxul-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: wontfix
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Thu, 15 May 2008 08:25:34 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#480798: Don't build depend on libxul-dev
has caused the Debian Bug report #480798,
regarding Don't build depend on libxul-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
The promising financial company seeks for new employees
If you have 5 free hours every week, a minimal experience in internet and free
phone to which we can contact you, you have possibility to start work with us
and earn more than 2000 $
If you are interested in our vacancy, contact us by
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-19
Severity: normal
gcc-4.2 gets installed with the current 'testing' by default, but it is
not the compiler used to compile the latest 2.6 series kernel package.
Therefore gcc-4.2 is no good for compiling other modules from source
(e.g. VMware modules, uvc-video,
Your message dated Thu, 15 May 2008 22:57:48 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#481403: gcc-4.1 creates no gcc symlink, gcc-4.2 does
has caused the Debian Bug report #481403,
regarding gcc-4.1 creates no gcc symlink, gcc-4.2 does
to be marked as done.
This means
Hi Arthur,
It has been closed by Arthur Loiret [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reply to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]).
/usr/bin/gcc symlink is provided by `gcc' package from `gcc-default' source
package, not by `gcc-4.2'.
Fine, you are right, the package name might be wrong, but the bug exists.
If I try to
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:10:28AM +0200, Alexis Huxley wrote:
Fine, you are right, the package name might be wrong, but the bug exists.
If I try to install 'gcc' (that should recreate the symlink, right?) then
I get:
The following extra packages will be installed:
gcc-4.2
I
Alexis Huxley wrote:
Hi Arthur,
It has been closed by Arthur Loiret [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reply to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]).
/usr/bin/gcc symlink is provided by `gcc' package from `gcc-default' source
package, not by `gcc-4.2'.
Fine, you are right, the package name might be wrong, but the
10 matches
Mail list logo
