Processed: Re: Bug#480800: Don't build depend on libxul-dev

2008-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 480800 + patch Bug#480800: Don't build depend on libxul-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#480800: Don't build depend on libxul-dev

2008-05-17 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 09:51:59AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: tag 480800 + patch thanks On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Package: gcj-4.2 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: xulrunner-transition With the upcoming xulrunner transition,

Bug#480800: Don't build depend on libxul-dev

2008-05-17 Thread Mike Hommey
tag 480800 + patch thanks On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Package: gcj-4.2 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: xulrunner-transition With the upcoming xulrunner transition, libxul-dev is going to disappear. I already sent instructions on what

Processed: Re: Bug#480802: Don't build depend on libxul-dev

2008-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 480802 + patch Bug#480802: Don't build depend on libxul-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#480802: Don't build depend on libxul-dev

2008-05-17 Thread Mike Hommey
tag 480802 + patch thanks On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Package: gcj-4.3 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: xulrunner-transition With the upcoming xulrunner transition, libxul-dev is going to disappear. I already sent instructions on what

Bug#481592: -g and compiling via assembly fails on IA64

2008-05-17 Thread Joachim Breitner
Package: gcc-4.3 Version: 4.3.0-4 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, when debugging a build failure of gtk2hs on ia64, I observed some strange problems with building via an assembler file and the -g flag. You can observe the problem with this minimal example:

Bug#480800: Don't build depend on libxul-dev

2008-05-17 Thread Matthias Klose
Mike Hommey writes: tag 480800 + patch thanks On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Package: gcj-4.2 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: xulrunner-transition With the upcoming xulrunner transition, libxul-dev is going to disappear. I

Bug#481628: FTBFS on mips/mipsel

2008-05-17 Thread Arthur Loiret
Package: libffi Version: 3.0.5-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Both mips64 (biarch64) and mipsn32 (biarchn32) builds are configure with --host=mips64-linux-gnu so headers from debian/libffi-dev/usr/include/$(biarch_gnu_type) are trying to be moved two times, in debian/lib64ffi-dev/usr/include

Bug#481628: Acknowledgement (FTBFS on mips/mipsel)

2008-05-17 Thread Arthur Loiret
With this patch /usr/include/mips64-linux-gnu/ is installed in both libn32ffi-dev and lib64ffi-dev, please wait for my next patch. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: [bts-link] source package gnat-4.1

2008-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gnat-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). # remote status report for

Bug#481628: Acknowledgement (FTBFS on mips/mipsel)

2008-05-17 Thread Arthur Loiret
Hi Thiemo, On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 04:13:20PM +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: With this patch /usr/include/mips64-linux-gnu/ is installed in both libn32ffi-dev and lib64ffi-dev, please wait for my next patch. Here is the diff between header from mips and mips64 builds (it is the same for mips64

Bug#481628: Acknowledgement (FTBFS on mips/mipsel)

2008-05-17 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Arthur Loiret wrote: Hi Thiemo, On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 04:13:20PM +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: With this patch /usr/include/mips64-linux-gnu/ is installed in both libn32ffi-dev and lib64ffi-dev, please wait for my next patch. Here is the diff between header from mips and mips64 builds

Results for 4.2.4 20080512 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.3-6) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu

2008-05-17 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon May 12 23:03:55 UTC 2008 (revision 135236) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu === libffi tests === Running target unix FAIL: libffi.call/cls_2byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test FAIL:

Results for 4.2.4 20080512 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.3-6) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi

2008-05-17 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon May 12 23:03:55 UTC 2008 (revision 135236) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi === libffi tests === Running target unix === libffi Summary === # of expected passes1389 # of unsupported tests 10

Results for 4.2.4 20080512 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.3-6) testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

2008-05-17 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon May 12 23:03:55 UTC 2008 (revision 135236) Target: hppa-linux-gnu gcc version 4.2.4 20080512 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.3-6) Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix === g++ Summary === # of expected